Foods that contain Lactose

Lactose

Lactose is the sugar of milk, and most adults worldwide stop making the enzyme that splits it. Here is what 23 studies show about who really has a problem, how much milk most people tolerate, and what helps.

Researched and written with Claude, an AI by Anthropic, and reviewed by Gerritjan Boeve. Every study is checked against PubMed.

Lactose is the sugar of milk. It is a sugar of the disaccharide type, made of one glucose joined to one galactose. An enzyme called lactase splits the two apart at the gut wall.

Lactose is the main sugar of human milk, which holds about 6.7 to 7.8 g per 100 mL when mature. In our USDA ranking, semi-skimmed cow’s milk has 5.01 g per 100 g. No daily need or limit is set for lactose on its own.

Most adults in the world make less lactase than they did as babies. A 2017 review puts lactase non-persistence (losing the enzyme after childhood) at 65% to 70% of the world’s adult population. Keeping the enzyme into adult life is the unusual trait.

It comes from small DNA changes next to the lactase gene. One, called C/T-13910, is found in Europeans, and three different ones in Tanzanians, Kenyans and Sudanese. That makes it a textbook case of the same adaptation arising more than once.

Here is what most readers have not been told: making less lactase does not mean milk makes you ill. An NIH (US National Institutes of Health) expert panel concluded in 2010 that most people with lactose malabsorption do not have clinical lactose intolerance. Malabsorption means not fully digesting lactose; intolerance means getting symptoms from it.

In a blinded trial, 30 people who said even a little milk upset them had only minimal symptoms on a cup of milk a day. That was no different from lactose-hydrolyzed milk, whose lactose is already split. A systematic review found that 12 to 15 g of lactose, about a cup of milk, is well tolerated by most adults.

In an analysis of 25 protected-origin Italian cheeses, most held too little lactose to measure. This page sets out what 23 studies and reports show, each at its real evidence level, including where the evidence is thin.

Health effects of lactose

The top findings from 23 studies, strongest evidence first

  • ★★★Lactase supplements aid lactose digestion (EU claim)The EU allows a claim that lactase supplements improve lactose digestion in people who have difficulty with it. In one trial of 47 adults with confirmed lactose intolerance, a single dose of lactase tablets cut breath hydrogen by 55% and eased symptoms.
  • ★★Most tolerate 12 to 15 g of lactoseIn a review of 36 trials, most adults with lactose malabsorption tolerated 12 to 15 g of lactose, about a cup of milk. An NIH panel said most people do not need to cut out dairy completely.
  • ★★Lactose-free foods may shorten children’s diarrheaIn 33 trials of children under 5 with acute diarrhea, it lasted about 18 hours less (17.77 hours) on lactose-free milk or foods. This applies to children who are not mainly breast-fed.
  • ★Daily milk caused few symptoms in self-reported intoleranceIn two small week-long trials, adults who said they were lactose intolerant had no significant rise in symptoms on regular milk compared with lactase-treated milk. In one trial, people with malabsorption had 2.5 more episodes of gas a day.
  • ★Yogurt lactose was digested better than milk lactoseYogurt with 18 g of lactose gave people with lactase deficiency about one third the breath hydrogen of milk with the same. Yogurt also brought fewer reports of diarrhea or flatulence.

All 19 studies, strongest evidence first

EU claim: lactase enzyme improves lactose digestion in poor digesters

The claim is on the list in Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, worded “Lactase enzyme improves lactose digestion in individuals who have difficulty digesting lactose”. It may be used only for food supplements, with at least 4,500 FCC (Food Chemicals Codex) units per dose. Labels must tell the target group to take the supplement with each meal that contains lactose. They must also say that tolerance to lactose varies, and that people should seek advice about the role of this substance in their diet. The basis is opinions from EFSA, the EU’s food safety agency, from 2009 and 2011 (claim IDs 1697, 1818 and 1974). The claim covers lactose digestion only, and says nothing about other health effects.

EFSA NDA Panel, 2009, EFSA J; Regulation (EU) No 432/2012

How we rate evidence

Most adults with malabsorption tolerate 12 to 15 g of lactose

This systematic review covered 36 randomized trials, published from 1967 to November 2009, in people with lactose intolerance or malabsorption. 26 tested lactase, lactose-hydrolyzed or lactose-reduced milk, or tolerable lactose doses; 7 tested probiotics, 2 colon adaptation and 1 another agent. The authors rate the evidence for 12 to 15 g, about a cup of milk, as moderate in quality. Evidence was too thin to say 0 to 2 g beats more than 12 g for symptoms, or that probiotics or colon adaptation help. Most trials enrolled people with malabsorption rather than proven intolerance, and the studies were too different to pool. PubMed lists NIH funding; the authors are at the University of Minnesota and the Minneapolis VA.

Shaukat et al., 2010, Ann Intern Med

How we rate evidence

In young children, lactose-free foods may shorten acute diarrhea about 18 hours

This Cochrane review pooled 33 randomized and quasi-randomized trials in 2,973 children under 5 with acute diarrhea, mostly stomach infections (gastroenteritis). Against lactose-containing milk or foods, diarrhea lasted 17.77 hours less on lactose-free ones (16 trials, 1,467 children, low-quality evidence). Treatment failure probably fell by about half (0.52 times the risk; 18 trials, 1,470 children, moderate-quality evidence). Diluted milk did not shorten diarrhea. Twenty-nine of the 33 trials were in hospital inpatients in high- or middle-income countries, 22 excluded breast-fed children, and none came from low-income countries. The conclusion applies to children who are not mainly breast-fed, and the authors report no conflict of interest.

MacGillivray et al., 2013, Cochrane Database Syst Rev

How we rate evidence

NIH panel: most people with malabsorption are not clinically intolerant

The 14-member panel heard 22 experts. It used a systematic review by the University of Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Lactose intolerance is a real clinical syndrome, it found, but its true prevalence is not known. Many people who think they are lactose intolerant are not lactose malabsorbers, and most people do not need to cut out dairy completely. Avoiding dairy can leave calcium and vitamin D too low, so the panel called for evidence-based diets that keep calcium and other nutrients adequate. The statement is the panel’s independent report, not an NIH policy.

Suchy et al., 2010, NIH Consens State Sci Statements

How we rate evidence

In 30 self-reported intolerant adults, daily milk caused minimal symptoms

In this randomized, double-blind crossover trial, adults aged 18 to 50 reported severe intolerance and symptoms after less than 240 mL of milk. On a 15 g lactose breath test, 21 had lactose malabsorption and 9 did not. For one week each, they drank 240 mL of 2% milk with breakfast: lactose-hydrolyzed, or regular milk sweetened with aspartame to match. Symptom scores stayed between 0.1 and 1.2 (1 is trivial, 2 is mild), with no statistically significant difference. In the malabsorbers, gas (flatus) was 2.5 episodes a day higher on regular milk. The authors suggest people may blame lactose for other belly symptoms; the trial was small and lasted a week.

Suarez et al., 1995, N Engl J Med

How we rate evidence

Two daily cups of milk caused no more symptoms than lactose-hydrolyzed milk

In this double-blind crossover trial, people with lactase non-persistence drank 240 mL of regular or lactose-hydrolyzed milk twice a day, with food, for 7 days. The group had 19 people who called themselves severely lactose intolerant and 13 who denied intolerance. Neither group had a statistically significant rise in symptoms on regular milk. But the 19 reported more gas than the 13 in both periods, which the authors read as underlying gas that is blamed on lactose. A personality questionnaire used alongside had questionable validity, because many answers looked guarded. Small trial, one week.

Suarez et al., 1997, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

In 20 maldigesters, 10 days of lactose cut breath hydrogen, halved gas

In this blinded, randomized crossover trial, adults who digest lactose poorly (maldigesters) took lactose or dextrose for 10 days each. Doses built from 0.6 to 1.0 g per kg a day in three doses, with no difference in symptoms between the two sugars. On days 11 and 22, they took a lactose test dose of 0.35 g per kg. Summed breath hydrogen was 385 ppm·h after dextrose and 9 ppm·h after lactose, and gas (flatus) frequency and severity fell by 50%. An earlier study in 9 maldigesters found that fecal beta-galactosidase, a lactose-splitting enzyme, rose threefold after 16 days of lactose. The authors take this as colonic adaptation, but the 2010 review judged the evidence for it insufficient.

Hertzler and Savaiano, 1996, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Lactase in milk cut symptom scores from 3.7 to 0.36 or 0.96

In this double-blind crossover study against a placebo (dummy), 30 adults (11 men and 19 women) aged 18 to 65 had lactose intolerance with malabsorption. Each drank 400 mL of semi-skimmed milk three times, in random order. It had lactase from Kluyveromyces lactis added 10 hours earlier (3,000 units) or 5 minutes earlier (6,000 units), or a placebo. Peak breath hydrogen was 12.07 and 13.97 ppm against 51.46 ppm on placebo, and the symptom score 0.36 and 0.96 against 3.7. The 10-hour treatment scored better than the 5-minute one. The enzyme was added to the milk, not taken as a tablet, and each test was a single milk drink. The abstract does not state funding.

Montalto et al., 2005, Eur J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

In 47 adults, lactase tablets cut breath hydrogen 55% and eased symptoms

In this randomized, double-blind crossover trial at a New Delhi hospital, adults with breath-test-confirmed lactose intolerance took lactase or a placebo. There was a one-week washout between visits. Adults (mean age 33.6, 30 men) rated symptoms on a visual analog scale, and breath hydrogen was measured every 30 minutes for 180 minutes. Over the 180 minutes, total breath hydrogen was 55% lower on lactase, and the clinical score and mean hydrogen level were lower. The abstract does not give the tablet dose or the funding, and each test followed a single dose.

Baijal and Tandon, 2021, JGH Open

How we rate evidence

2019 review: symptoms depend on dose, lactase, gut bacteria and sensitivity

This is a narrative review, not a trial. It defines lactase deficiency (the enzyme is not made) and lactose malabsorption (any failure to digest or absorb lactose in the small intestine). Malabsorption can come from genes or from infection and other bowel conditions; intolerance means abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhea after lactose with malabsorption. People with visceral hypersensitivity (an oversensitive gut) linked to anxiety or irritable bowel syndrome are at higher risk of symptoms. Self-reported intolerance, test results and the response to a diet vary in how well they agree. Low-lactose diets, lactase and possibly prebiotics help only modestly, because lactose is one of several poorly absorbed carbohydrates.

Misselwitz et al., 2019, Gut

How we rate evidence

European guideline: breath tests show malabsorption; intolerance also needs symptom checks

This Delphi consensus guideline, where experts vote in rounds, came from three European gastroenterology societies, with 44 experts from 18 countries. Of 88 statements, 82 reached consensus (80% agreement or more). It recommends that breath tests for carbohydrate malabsorption, lactose included, come with validated symptom evaluation before intolerance is diagnosed. Two authors are shareholders of Carboception GmbH, a company named in the conflict statement.

Hammer et al., 2022, United European Gastroenterol J

How we rate evidence

Lactose and lactase deficiency change calcium absorption little in adults

This narrative review of human and animal studies covered lactose, lactase deficiency, calcium absorption and bone. Its Purdue University authors report no conflict of interest. Lactose intolerance may lead to lower bone density and fragility fractures when people eat less dairy or avoid it. Dairy intake has a weak but statistically clear link with bone health, especially in children. Several public health organizations advise three dairy servings a day, including for people with lactose intolerance.

Hodges et al., 2019, Nutrients

How we rate evidence

One third of 427 reported intolerance; only about half maldigested lactose

In this cross-sectional (snapshot) study of healthy people, intolerance meant symptoms from dairy foods with 20 g of lactose or less. A lactose tolerance test with ethanol found 101 maldigesters and 326 digesters, and irritable bowel syndrome (by Rome criteria) was equally common in both (15%). Feeling intolerant was linked with lactose maldigestion (odds ratio 10.3), irritable bowel syndrome (4.6), other non-gut symptoms (2.3) and female sex (2.1). Among people with irritable bowel syndrome, 60% reported lactose intolerance against 27% overall, though the share of maldigesters was the same (24%).

Vesa et al., 1998, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

A single DNA change, C/T-13910, fully matched lactase non-persistence

This genetic study in nine extended Finnish families narrowed the location to a 47-kb stretch on chromosome 2. The variant sits about 14 kb upstream of the lactase gene. In 236 people from four populations it matched non-persistence in every case; a second variant, G/A-22018, matched 229. The C/T-13910 frequency in 1,047 DNA samples fitted the known rate of adult-type hypolactasia (low lactase) in four populations. Its presence in distantly related groups suggests it is very old. The authors describe lactase non-persistence as a common autosomal recessive condition.

Enattah et al., 2002, Nat Genet

How we rate evidence

In 470 East Africans, three other DNA changes went with lactase persistence

In this genotype-phenotype study of Tanzanians, Kenyans and Sudanese, the three changes were G/C-14010, T/G-13915 and C/G-13907. Each raised activity from the lactase promoter (the gene’s on-switch) in test-tube experiments. They arose on different haplotype (DNA block) backgrounds from the European one, C/T-13910, and from each other. More than 2.0 Mb of shared DNA around C-14010 fits a selective sweep (strong natural selection) over roughly the past 7,000 years. The authors call it convergent evolution, driven by animal domestication and adult milk drinking.

Tishkoff et al., 2007, Nat Genet

How we rate evidence

Early European milk use did not explain the spread of lactase persistence

This archaeological and genetic study used about 7,000 pottery fat residues from more than 550 sites, covering the past 9,000 years. Milk use in Europe was widespread from the Neolithic, the first farming era. Yet selection for lactase persistence fit milk-use levels no better than uniform selection since the Neolithic. In 500,000 present-day Europeans in the UK Biobank, the persistence genotype was only weakly linked with milk drinking. It was not consistently linked with better fitness or health indicators. The authors propose that in famine or heavy exposure to germs, milk was a disadvantage for non-persistent people, which drove selection. They report no competing interests.

Evershed et al., 2022, Nature

How we rate evidence

In 97,811 Danes, the lactase persistence variant had no hip fracture link

This Mendelian randomization study uses a gene variant as a stand-in for lifelong milk intake. It covered three Danish cohorts of adults aged 20 and older, plus a meta-analysis with five other Northern European studies. Each T allele (gene copy) of LCT-13910 went with 0.58 more glasses of milk a week. Yet hip fracture risk did not change (hazard ratio 1.01). In the pooled analysis, any fracture had an odds ratio of 0.86 for TT against CC, with a wide range that included no effect. Femoral neck bone density was higher in TT (standardized difference 0.10), with no difference at the lumbar spine or total hip.

Bergholdt et al., 2018, J Intern Med

How we rate evidence

Self-reported intolerance went with less milk and calcium, lower bone density

In this cross-sectional survey of 843 Japanese adults, 191 (22.7%) reported intolerance. They took 32.9 g of milk per 1,000 kcal a day against 63.4 g, and 243.7 mg of calcium per 1,000 kcal against 285.5 mg. Their bone density Z-score was lower after adjustment (β −0.1615). Three authors are employees of Megmilk Snow Brand, a dairy maker that sells lactose-hydrolyzed milk and funds the department that ran the study. Intolerance was self-reported, and a survey cannot show cause.

Kawata et al., 2025, Eur J Nutr

How we rate evidence

Gut medicines often hide lactose, in amounts that may add to symptoms

The authors listed the drugs for gut conditions in the British National Formulary and checked their excipients (fillers). They measured lactose in a selection by high-performance liquid chromatography, a lab test. Lactose is the most common excipient in drug formulations, and many products contained it. The amounts are not on the label or leaflet, lactose-free alternatives exist, and this was not a trial in people.

Eadala et al., 2009, Aliment Pharmacol Ther

How we rate evidence

Foods high in lactose

Lactose is the sugar of mammal milk, so the real sources are milk and foods made from it. In our USDA ranking per serving, semi-skimmed cow’s milk is the only food with a lactose value. It has 12.3 g in 1 cup (246 g), or 5.01 g per 100 g.

The ranking is short because our data holds a lactose value for very few foods, not because other dairy foods have none. So it cannot tell you about yogurt, cheese or ice cream. By our arithmetic, a cup of milk sits at the low end of a key range. Most adults with malabsorption tolerated 12 to 15 g in the 2010 review.

Fermented and aged dairy differ from milk. In a breath test, each test meal held 20 g of lactose. Plain yogurt gave 76 ppm·h of breath hydrogen and plain kefir 87, against 224 for milk.

In the Italian cheese analysis, most of 25 protected-origin cheeses held under 10 mg of lactose per kg. Fresh Mozzarella di Bufala, the positive control (a sample known to hold lactose), held 3,540 mg per kg (about 0.35%, our arithmetic). A Pecorino Toscano held 336.8 mg per kg at 20 days and 28 mg per kg at 60 days.

A 2017 review lists hard cheeses, yogurt and lactose-hydrolyzed milk among the lower-lactose foods that people with intolerance can use.

Lactose also hides outside the dairy aisle. It is the most common filler (excipient) in drug formulations, and the amount is not on the label.

On food labels, the 2025-2030 US Dietary Guidelines list lactose among the names under which added sugars can appear. They say the sugars naturally in plain milk are not added sugars. The WHO (World Health Organization) free sugars guideline likewise does not cover sugars naturally present in milk, because no adverse effects of them were reported.

Per serving. No daily amount is set, so bars compare each food with the top food.

Per 100 g. No daily amount is set, so bars compare each food with the top food.

Per 100 kcal: the same calories of each food, for a fair comparison. Bars compare each food with the top food.

Food labels have no Daily Value or Reference Intake for lactose, so the % compares each food with the top food.

  1. 1.Semi-skimmed cows milkEggs and Dairy · per 1 cup (246 g)12.3 g
  1. 1.Semi-skimmed cows milkEggs and Dairy5.01 g
  1. 1.Semi-skimmed cows milkEggs and Dairy10 g

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. FoodData Central. Values as shown in the ranking above.
  2. Hertzler SR, Clancy SM. Kefir improves lactose digestion and tolerance in adults with lactose maldigestion. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003.
  3. Facioni MS, Dominici S, Marescotti F, et al. Lactose residual content in PDO cheeses: novel inclusions for consumers with lactose intolerance. Foods. 2021. Individual cheese values in the text are from the full paper.
  4. Bayless TM, Brown E, Paige DM. Lactase non-persistence and lactose intolerance. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017.
  5. Eadala P, Waud JP, Matthews SB, et al. Quantifying the “hidden” lactose in drugs used for the treatment of gastrointestinal conditions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009.
  6. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030. January 2026. Page 5 of the PDF covers added sugars; page 3 the dairy goal.
  7. World Health Organization. WHO calls on countries to reduce sugars intake among adults and children. News release on the guideline Sugars intake for adults and children. 4 March 2015.
  8. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2010.

How lactose works

The basic biochemistry is well established, and what it means for people is tested in the study cards above.

Four ideas cover most of it. Lactase splits lactose at the gut wall. Most adults make less lactase after weaning, under gene control.

Lactose that is not split is fermented in the colon. Yogurt brings its own lactase. Here is each one, and what has been seen in people.

Lactase splits it at the gut wall

Lactase, formally lactase-phlorizin hydrolase, sits in the cells lining the small intestine. It splits lactose into glucose and galactose. Lactose is the main source of calories in milk for infants.

Misselwitz and colleagues separate three terms that are often mixed up. Lactase deficiency means the enzyme is not made. Lactose malabsorption is any failure to digest or absorb lactose in the small intestine. Lactose intolerance is abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhea after lactose in someone with malabsorption.

Malabsorption can be primary, from genes, or secondary, from infection or other conditions that harm the lining of the small bowel.

Lactose in milkOne glucose joined to one galactoseenough lactase on the gut wall splits itGlucose and galactoseTaken up as single sugarsWith too little lactaseLactose passes on to the colonNot split, so not taken upgut bacteria ferment itGas, acids and extra fluidHydrogen, short-chain fatty acids, lactateWhether this causes symptoms depends on the dose,the gut bacteria and how sensitive the gut is.

What happens to lactose with and without enough lactase, simplified. Not to scale.

Misselwitz et al., 2019, Gut; Enattah et al., 2002, Nat Genet; He et al., 2006, J Nutr; Boyce et al., 2011, Nutr Res

How we rate evidence

Most adults make less lactase after weaning

Enattah and colleagues describe lactase non-persistence as a common autosomal recessive condition: lactase activity falls after weaning. The persistence changes sit in a stretch of DNA about 14 kb upstream of the lactase gene. In test-tube studies, that stretch acts as an enhancer (a switch that turns the gene up).

Ingram and colleagues explain that several separate changes within 100 bases of each other can each lead to persistence. The European T allele sits on a haplotype (a block of DNA inherited together) of 500 kb or more. That means it is recent and was strongly favored by selection.

Tishkoff and colleagues found three other changes in East African groups that raise activity of the lactase promoter. They sit on different haplotype backgrounds from the European one.

The simple story, that drinking milk caused the spread of persistence, is now under question. A 2009 simulation placed the first selection of the European allele about 7,500 years ago. That was among dairying farmers between the central Balkans and central Europe.

The 2022 pottery study found that selection did not track how much milk was used. It also found the persistence genotype only weakly linked with milk intake in modern Europeans.

A gene test can show non-persistence in northern Europeans, but not whether a person gets symptoms. The link between self-reported intolerance, test results and the response to a diet is variable.

Undigested lactose is fermented in the colon

Lactose that is not split reaches the colon, where bacteria ferment it. The NIAID (US allergy institute) food allergy guidelines describe the result as excess fluid in the gut, with abdominal pain and diarrhea. In stool samples from 28 Chinese adults, 5 consistently intolerant people fermented lactose to acetate, propionate, butyrate and lactate faster than 7 consistently tolerant ones. The rate of lactose breakdown and the bacterial mix did not differ.

The colon can also adapt. In 9 lactose maldigesters, fecal beta-galactosidase rose threefold after 16 days of lactose. In 20 maldigesters, 10 days of daily lactose cut the breath hydrogen rise after a lactose test from 385 to 9 ppm·h.

After 10 days of dextrose385After 10 days of daily lactose9

Summed breath hydrogen (ppm·h) over 8 hours after a lactose test dose of 0.35 g per kg, drawn to scale. Crossover trial in 20 adults with lactose maldigestion; the second bar is nearly flat.

Hertzler and Savaiano, 1996, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Yogurt brings its own lactase

In yogurt, live bacteria carry lactase with them. Kolars and colleagues found that 18 g of lactose in yogurt gave about one third of the breath hydrogen of the same lactose in milk. They explained it by lactase released from the yogurt organisms inside the gut.

15 adults with lactose maldigestion ate test meals with 20 g of lactose. Plain yogurt and plain kefir gave far less breath hydrogen than milk. Flavored kefir was in between, and yogurts and kefirs cut the perceived severity of flatulence by 54% to 71%.

Milk224Plain yogurt76Flavored yogurt76Plain kefir87Flavored kefir156

Summed breath hydrogen (ppm·h) over 8 hours after test meals with 20 g of lactose, drawn to scale. Orange is milk, teal is yogurt, magenta is kefir. Randomized block design in 15 adults.

Hertzler and Clancy, 2003, J Am Diet Assoc

How we rate evidence

What has been seen in people

The mechanisms match the cards above in one respect and surprise in another. Malabsorption is common, but symptoms depend on the dose. A cup of milk a day gave only minimal symptoms in people who said they were severely intolerant. And the 2010 review found 12 to 15 g well tolerated by most adults.

Feeling intolerant is not the same as malabsorption either. In 427 healthy people, only about half of those who reported intolerance were maldigesters, and irritable bowel syndrome and female sex also explained it.

Lactase itself works in trials. Tablets gave 55% less breath hydrogen in 47 adults, and lactase added to milk gave symptom scores of 0.36 and 0.96 against 3.7. Both are small, short crossover tests of single doses.

Sources

  1. Misselwitz B, Butter M, Verbeke K, Fox MR. Update on lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management. Gut. 2019.
  2. Enattah NS, Sahi T, Savilahti E, et al. Identification of a variant associated with adult-type hypolactasia. Nat Genet. 2002.
  3. Ingram CJ, Mulcare CA, Itan Y, et al. Lactose digestion and the evolutionary genetics of lactase persistence. Hum Genet. 2009.
  4. Tishkoff SA, Reed FA, Ranciaro A, et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat Genet. 2007.
  5. Itan Y, Powell A, Beaumont MA, et al. The origins of lactase persistence in Europe. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009.
  6. Evershed RP, Davey Smith G, Roffet-Salque M, et al. Dairying, diseases and the evolution of lactase persistence in Europe. Nature. 2022.
  7. Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report. Nutr Res. 2011. Full text read for the definitions of milk allergy and lactose intolerance.
  8. He T, Priebe MG, Harmsen HJ, et al. Colonic fermentation may play a role in lactose intolerance in humans. J Nutr. 2006.
  9. Hertzler SR, Savaiano DA. Colonic adaptation to daily lactose feeding in lactose maldigesters reduces lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996.
  10. Kolars JC, Levitt MD, Aouji M, Savaiano DA. Yogurt: an autodigesting source of lactose. N Engl J Med. 1984.
  11. Hertzler SR, Clancy SM. Kefir improves lactose digestion and tolerance in adults with lactose maldigestion. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003.
  12. Suarez FL, Savaiano DA, Levitt MD. A comparison of symptoms after the consumption of milk or lactose-hydrolyzed milk by people with self-reported severe lactose intolerance. N Engl J Med. 1995.
  13. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
  14. Vesa TH, Seppo LM, Marteau PR, et al. Role of irritable bowel syndrome in subjective lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998.
  15. Baijal R, Tandon RK. Effect of lactase on symptoms and hydrogen breath levels in lactose intolerance: a crossover placebo-controlled study. JGH Open. 2021.
  16. Montalto M, Nucera G, Santoro L, et al. Effect of exogenous beta-galactosidase in patients with lactose malabsorption and intolerance: a crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005.

How much lactose do you need?

You need none: no daily amount of lactose is required. Most adults with lactose malabsorption tolerate 12 to 15 g at a time, about 1 cup of milk. No official body that we found sets a daily need or an upper limit for lactose on its own. The nearest official values cover all carbohydrate or all added and free sugars, and they are set out below.

SourceGroupValueNotes
National Academies (IOM) 2005, as listed in the 2020-2025 Dietary GuidelinesPeople aged 2 and olderCarbohydrate RDA 130 g a day; AMDR 45 to 65% of energyTotal carbohydrate, not lactose. Neither value is set for any single sugar.
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030 (current edition)General populationNo amount of added sugars is recommended; one meal should contain no more than 10 g of added sugars. Dairy goal of 3 servings a day on a 2,000 kcal pattern, full-fat dairy with no added sugars.Lactose is listed among the names added sugars can have on ingredient labels. The sugars naturally in plain milk are not added sugars.
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 (previous edition)People aged 2 and olderAdded sugars under 10% of calories a dayAbout 200 kcal, or 50 g of sugar, on a 2,000 kcal diet (our arithmetic). The guidelines say people who are lactose intolerant can choose low-lactose and lactose-free dairy products.
WHO guideline, 2015Adults and childrenFree sugars under 10% of total energy; below 5%, roughly 25 g a day, for added benefitThe guideline does not refer to sugars naturally present in milk, because no adverse effects were reported.
Systematic review of 36 trials (Shaukat), 2010Adults with lactose intolerance or malabsorption12 to 15 g of lactose well tolerated by mostA review finding of moderate-quality evidence, not an official limit. About 1 cup of milk.
Any authority we foundLactose on its ownNo daily need and no upper limitThe site’s intake box also shows no FDA or EU reference value for lactose.
Gram values for percent-of-energy figures are our arithmetic: percent × 2,000 kcal ÷ 4 kcal per g of sugar.

The number that matters for the gut is how much lactose arrives at once, and with what. In the trials, people took milk with breakfast or with food. Two cups a day, taken as two doses with food, gave no more symptoms than lactose-hydrolyzed milk in lactase non-persistent adults.

Above the 12 to 15 g range the evidence is thinner. The 2010 review found too little evidence that milk with 0 to 2 g of lactose beats milk with more than 12 g for symptoms.

The nutrient to watch is calcium, not lactose. The US Institute of Medicine sets the calcium RDA (Recommended Dietary Allowance) at 1,000 mg a day for adults aged 19 to 50. It is 1,200 mg for women aged 51 to 70 and for everyone over 70.

The NIH panel warned that people who avoid dairy, for real or perceived intolerance, may take in too little calcium and vitamin D. The 2025-2030 US guidelines set a goal of 3 dairy servings a day on a 2,000 kcal pattern.

A review found that lactose itself changes calcium absorption little in adults, so the calcium in lactose-free dairy should be absorbed about as well. See our pages on calcium and vitamin D.

Lactase deficiency: signs and who is at risk

Lactose in dairy products can bring abdominal pain and swelling, rumbling gut noises, gas and diarrhea in people who do not digest it. Primary lactase deficiency, from genes, is the usual pattern worldwide.

Secondary deficiency follows infection or other conditions that harm the lining of the small bowel. Young children with acute diarrhea may temporarily stop making lactase. A pilot study looked at 15 kidney transplant recipients. All 7 with chronic norovirus infection had positive lactose breath and tolerance tests, against 1 of 8 without it.

People with irritable bowel syndrome or visceral hypersensitivity are at higher risk of symptoms after lactose, whether or not they digest it well.

Tests include genetic, endoscopic and physiological ones. The lactose breath test is the usual one.

A North American consensus agreed on a 25 g dose. A rise in breath hydrogen of 20 ppm or more from baseline counts as positive for maldigestion. Bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine is excluded first, to avoid false positives.

A European guideline adds that a positive breath test shows malabsorption, and that intolerance needs validated symptom assessment alongside.

Misselwitz and colleagues define intolerance as symptoms after lactose that do not appear after a placebo, in a person with maldigestion. They note that such blinded testing is not part of current practice. Self-diagnosis is unreliable: in the cards above, about half of the people who reported intolerance were not maldigesters.

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025. 9th edition. 2020. Appendix 1, Table A1-2, lists the carbohydrate RDA and AMDR and the added sugars goal; the dairy chapter advises people who are lactose intolerant to choose low-lactose and lactose-free dairy products.
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030. January 2026. Page 5 of the PDF covers added sugars; page 3 the dairy goal.
  3. World Health Organization. WHO calls on countries to reduce sugars intake among adults and children. News release on the guideline Sugars intake for adults and children. 4 March 2015.
  4. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
  5. Suarez FL, Savaiano D, Arbisi P, Levitt MD. Tolerance to the daily ingestion of two cups of milk by individuals claiming lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997.
  6. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011. Table 1 gives the calcium RDAs by age.
  7. Suchy FJ, Brannon PM, Carpenter TO, et al. NIH consensus development conference statement: Lactose intolerance and health. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010.
  8. Hodges JK, Cao S, Cladis DP, Weaver CM. Lactose intolerance and bone health: the challenge of ensuring adequate calcium intake. Nutrients. 2019.
  9. Deng Y, Misselwitz B, Dai N, Fox M. Lactose intolerance in adults: biological mechanism and dietary management. Nutrients. 2015.
  10. Misselwitz B, Butter M, Verbeke K, Fox MR. Update on lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management. Gut. 2019.
  11. Misselwitz B, Pohl D, Frühauf H, et al. Lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013.
  12. MacGillivray S, Fahey T, McGuire W. Lactose avoidance for young children with acute diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.
  13. Bonani M, Pereira RM, Misselwitz B, et al. Chronic norovirus infection as a risk factor for secondary lactose maldigestion in renal transplant recipients: a prospective parallel cohort pilot study. Transplantation. 2017.
  14. Vesa TH, Seppo LM, Marteau PR, et al. Role of irritable bowel syndrome in subjective lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998.
  15. Rezaie A, Buresi M, Lembo A, et al. Hydrogen and methane-based breath testing in gastrointestinal disorders: the North American consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017.
  16. Hammer HF, Fox MR, Keller J, et al. European guideline on indications, performance, and clinical impact of hydrogen and methane breath tests in adult and pediatric patients. United European Gastroenterol J. 2022.

Forms of lactose: absorption and effects

Lactose reaches people in milk and dairy foods, and as lactose-free milk, where added lactase has split it. Some people take lactase drops or tablets with food.

Lactose is also in fermented dairy such as yogurt and kefir, in aged cheese, in infant formula, and in medicines as a filler. The forms differ in how much lactose arrives at once and whether lactase comes with it.

The honest bottom line: for people with malabsorption, the amount per sitting and eating it with food matter more than the form. A cup of regular milk is tolerated by most. For larger amounts, lactase and fermented dairy have the better evidence.

Some popular claims have no trial behind them. We found no trial showing that lactose-free milk is healthier than regular milk for people who digest lactose. We found none comparing one brand or form of lactase with another. And the 2010 review judged the evidence insufficient for probiotics sold to ease lactose intolerance (7 trials).

FormWhat it isWhat studies showSource
Regular milkCow’s milk with its own lactose: 5.01 g per 100 g and 12.3 g in a cup of semi-skimmed in our USDA dataA cup a day gave minimal symptoms in people who said milk upset them; two cups a day in two doses with food gave no more symptoms than lactose-hydrolyzed milk. The 2010 review found 12 to 15 g well tolerated by most.1, 2, 3, 4
Lactose-free (lactose-hydrolyzed) milkMilk in which lactase has split the lactose into glucose and galactoseAt a cup a day, symptoms did not differ from regular milk. The 2010 review found the evidence insufficient that milk with 0 to 2 g of lactose beats milk with more than 12 g. The 2020-2025 US guidelines name lactose-free products as a choice for people who are lactose intolerant. We found no trial showing it is healthier.2, 4, 5, 6
Lactase drops, tablets and capsulesLactase enzyme added to milk or taken with a lactose-containing mealAdded to 400 mL of milk, lactase cut peak breath hydrogen from 51 to 12 or 14 ppm and symptom scores from 3.7 to 0.36 or 0.96. Tablets cut cumulative breath hydrogen by 55% in 47 adults. The EU claim covers supplements with at least 4,500 FCC units taken with each lactose-containing meal.7, 8, 9
Yogurt and kefirFermented milk with live cultures that carry lactaseBreath hydrogen was about a third of milk’s with 18 g of lactose in yogurt. With 20 g test meals, plain yogurt gave 76 ppm·h, plain kefir 87 and flavored kefir 156, against 224 for milk.10, 11
Aged and hard cheeseCheese in which most lactose is used up during making and agingMost of 25 protected-origin Italian cheeses held under 10 mg per kg. Fresh Mozzarella di Bufala held 3,540 mg per kg, and a young Pecorino Toscano 336.8 mg per kg at 20 days and 28 mg per kg at 60 days. A review lists hard cheeses among lower-lactose foods. The analysis authors have ties to a lactose-free business.12, 13
Breast milk and infant formulaMature breast milk holds about 6.7 to 7.8 g of lactose per 100 mL; standard cow’s-milk formulas contain lactose, lactose-free ones use other carbohydrate, such as the glucose polymers in one trialA lactose formula gave 10.3% more calcium absorption than a lactose-free one, with the same zinc absorption. A lactose-free formula supported normal growth over 112 days. In young children with acute diarrhea, lactose-free products shortened the illness by about 18 hours (low-quality evidence).14, 15, 16, 17
Lactose in medicinesA filler (excipient) in tablets and capsulesCommon in medicines for gut conditions, with the amount not on the label; lactose-free alternatives exist.18
Source numbers refer to the list below. Most trials tested a single food or dose, not lactose on its own.

Here are the form-specific studies, strongest evidence first, 4 in all.

All 4 studies, strongest evidence first

Yogurt lactose gave about one third the breath hydrogen of milk

This breath hydrogen test in people with lactase deficiency compared 18 g of lactose in yogurt with the same lactose in milk or water. Yogurt also brought fewer reports of diarrhea or flatulence. The authors explain it by lactase released from the yogurt organisms, which digests lactose inside the gut. The abstract does not give the number of people tested or the funding, and it tested one yogurt.

Kolars et al., 1984, N Engl J Med

How we rate evidence

In 18 infants, total calcium absorption was 10.3% higher with lactose formula

In this blinded crossover trial, full-term infants aged 8 to 12 weeks had two partly hydrolyzed whey-protein formulas for 2 weeks each. One had lactose and one had glucose polymers, and stable isotope tracers measured absorption. Total calcium absorption was 10.3% higher (60 mg a day) on lactose than on the lactose-free one, while fractional zinc absorption (32%) did not differ. The authors say the lactose-free formula still gave enough calcium for full-term infants, when its calcium content matched lactose-based formulas. PubMed lists US government funding.

Abrams et al., 2002, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Over 112 days, babies on lactose-free formula grew as well

This randomized, blinded trial compared an experimental lactose-free milk-protein formula (63 infants) with a standard lactose formula (65 infants) in healthy term babies. Growth was 31.1 against 29.4 g a day, and weight, length and head circumference were similar and normal. Blood chemistry stayed in the normal range, tolerance was comparable, and the lactose-free formula gave softer stools and fewer spit-ups. The lead author’s listed address is at Abbott, a formula maker, and the abstract does not say who paid.

Lasekan et al., 2011, Clin Pediatr (Phila)

How we rate evidence

In 25 Italian cheeses, most held too little lactose to measure

This lab analysis of protected-origin cheeses used two sensitive methods (HPAEC-PAD and LC/MS-MS), plus interviews with the cheese consortia. Most held under 10 mg of lactose per kg. Production rules vary widely, so each cheese should be checked, and called naturally lactose-free only after repeated analysis, the authors say. One author is a partner of a company, ELLEFREE, and president of an Italian association of lactose-intolerant people. Food analysis, not a trial in people.

Facioni et al., 2021, Foods

How we rate evidence

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. FoodData Central. Values as shown in the ranking above.
  2. Suarez FL, Savaiano DA, Levitt MD. A comparison of symptoms after the consumption of milk or lactose-hydrolyzed milk by people with self-reported severe lactose intolerance. N Engl J Med. 1995.
  3. Suarez FL, Savaiano D, Arbisi P, Levitt MD. Tolerance to the daily ingestion of two cups of milk by individuals claiming lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997.
  4. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
  5. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025. 9th edition. 2020. Appendix 1, Table A1-2, lists the carbohydrate RDA and AMDR and the added sugars goal; the dairy chapter advises people who are lactose intolerant to choose low-lactose and lactose-free dairy products.
  6. Misselwitz B, Butter M, Verbeke K, Fox MR. Update on lactose malabsorption and intolerance: pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management. Gut. 2019.
  7. Montalto M, Nucera G, Santoro L, et al. Effect of exogenous beta-galactosidase in patients with lactose malabsorption and intolerance: a crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005.
  8. Baijal R, Tandon RK. Effect of lactase on symptoms and hydrogen breath levels in lactose intolerance: a crossover placebo-controlled study. JGH Open. 2021.
  9. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012. Annex, list of permitted health claims (entry for lactase enzyme). Regulation (EU) No 432/2012.
  10. Kolars JC, Levitt MD, Aouji M, Savaiano DA. Yogurt: an autodigesting source of lactose. N Engl J Med. 1984.
  11. Hertzler SR, Clancy SM. Kefir improves lactose digestion and tolerance in adults with lactose maldigestion. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003.
  12. Facioni MS, Dominici S, Marescotti F, et al. Lactose residual content in PDO cheeses: novel inclusions for consumers with lactose intolerance. Foods. 2021. Individual cheese values in the text are from the full paper.
  13. Bayless TM, Brown E, Paige DM. Lactase non-persistence and lactose intolerance. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017.
  14. Ballard O, Morrow AL. Human milk composition: nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013. The lactose range is from the full text.
  15. Abrams SA, Griffin IJ, Davila PM. Calcium and zinc absorption from lactose-containing and lactose-free infant formulas. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002.
  16. Lasekan JB, Jacobs J, Reisinger KS, et al. Lactose-free milk protein-based infant formula: impact on growth and gastrointestinal tolerance in infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011.
  17. MacGillivray S, Fahey T, McGuire W. Lactose avoidance for young children with acute diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.
  18. Eadala P, Waud JP, Matthews SB, et al. Quantifying the “hidden” lactose in drugs used for the treatment of gastrointestinal conditions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009.

Is lactose safe? Limits and who should watch it

For people who digest lactose, food amounts are not a safety concern, and we found no upper limit for lactose set by any authority. The WHO guideline leaves out sugars naturally present in milk, because no adverse effects were reported.

For people who do not digest it, symptoms depend on the dose. The NIH panel found that most people with malabsorption do not have clinical intolerance. Several groups need more care.

  • Lactose intolerance and irritable bowel syndrome. Gas, bloating, pain and diarrhea after dairy are common, and they depend on the dose. Irritable bowel syndrome can look like lactose intolerance, so ask a doctor before cutting out dairy for good.
  • Classical galactosemia. This inborn error of galactose metabolism has an international treatment guideline. Lactose supplies galactose. Lactose-free milk is milk whose lactose has been split into glucose and galactose, so the galactose is still there. Anyone with galactosemia should follow their metabolic team’s advice. See our page on galactose.
  • Milk allergy. An allergy is an immune response to milk protein. Lactose is not an allergen, because the response to it is not immune based. Lactase pills and lactose-free milk do not treat an allergy, so ask a doctor if you suspect one.
  • Infants and young children. In young children with acute diarrhea who are not mainly breast-fed, lactose-free products may shorten the illness. But 22 of 33 trials excluded breast-fed children, and none were from low-income countries. Talk to a pediatrician before changing an infant’s formula.
  • Medicines and supplements. Lactose is the most common filler in tablets and capsules, and the amount is not listed. People with marked symptoms can ask a pharmacist for lactose-free versions. Lactase supplements had no side effects in the 2005 trial. The EU claim requires a note that tolerance to lactose is variable and that people should seek advice. We found no report of an interaction between dietary lactose and a medicine.

How to handle lactose

  • Keep to about a cup at a time, with food. Most adults with malabsorption tolerated 12 to 15 g. A cup a day with breakfast gave only minimal symptoms in people who said milk upset them. Spread larger amounts over the day.
  • Pick fermented or aged dairy. Yogurt and kefir gave far less breath hydrogen than milk in test meals. Most of 25 protected-origin Italian cheeses held under 10 mg of lactose per kg, though each cheese differs and fresh cheese held far more.
  • Use lactose-free milk or lactase, and keep the calcium. Lactase cut breath hydrogen and symptom scores in both trials, and the calcium in dairy is what dairy avoidance can lose. Adults need 1,000 mg a day at ages 19 to 50.

Sources

  1. Suarez FL, Savaiano DA, Levitt MD. A comparison of symptoms after the consumption of milk or lactose-hydrolyzed milk by people with self-reported severe lactose intolerance. N Engl J Med. 1995.
  2. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
  3. Hertzler SR, Clancy SM. Kefir improves lactose digestion and tolerance in adults with lactose maldigestion. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003.
  4. Facioni MS, Dominici S, Marescotti F, et al. Lactose residual content in PDO cheeses: novel inclusions for consumers with lactose intolerance. Foods. 2021. Individual cheese values in the text are from the full paper.
  5. Montalto M, Nucera G, Santoro L, et al. Effect of exogenous beta-galactosidase in patients with lactose malabsorption and intolerance: a crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005.
  6. Baijal R, Tandon RK. Effect of lactase on symptoms and hydrogen breath levels in lactose intolerance: a crossover placebo-controlled study. JGH Open. 2021.
  7. Suchy FJ, Brannon PM, Carpenter TO, et al. NIH consensus development conference statement: Lactose intolerance and health. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010.
  8. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011. Table 1 gives the calcium RDAs by age.
  9. Welling L, Bernstein LE, Berry GT, et al. International clinical guideline for the management of classical galactosemia: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017.
  10. Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report. Nutr Res. 2011. Full text read for the definitions of milk allergy and lactose intolerance.
  11. MacGillivray S, Fahey T, McGuire W. Lactose avoidance for young children with acute diarrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.
  12. Eadala P, Waud JP, Matthews SB, et al. Quantifying the “hidden” lactose in drugs used for the treatment of gastrointestinal conditions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009.
  13. Vesa TH, Seppo LM, Marteau PR, et al. Role of irritable bowel syndrome in subjective lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998.
  14. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012. Annex, list of permitted health claims (entry for lactase enzyme). Regulation (EU) No 432/2012.
  15. World Health Organization. WHO calls on countries to reduce sugars intake among adults and children. News release on the guideline Sugars intake for adults and children. 4 March 2015.

History of lactose

Reports in the early 1960s showed that adult lactase decline is common. A 1963 report in Gastroenterology described intestinal lactase deficiency and lactose intolerance in adults. A 1965 Lancet paper was titled “Lactase deficiency in the adult. A common occurrence.”

In 1970 Frederick Simoons proposed a culture-historical hypothesis linking adult lactose intolerance to the milking habit. Ingram and colleagues note that for some 40 years it has been known that lactase lasts into adult life in some people but not others.

The gene story came later. In 2002 the Finnish group of Enattah found C/T-13910. In 2007 Tishkoff’s group found three other changes in East Africa, so persistence arose several times. A 2009 simulation put the first selection of the European allele about 7,500 years ago among dairying farmers.

In 2022 a large team of archaeologists and geneticists studied about 7,000 pottery fat residues. They found that milk use did not explain the spread, and proposed that famine and disease exposure did.

The research argument is also young. A 2017 review notes that the dairy industry and Minnesota investigators have worked to minimize the influence of lactose intolerance on milk consumption.

Several tolerance studies on this page come from Minnesota investigators: Suarez, Savaiano and Levitt, and the 2010 review by Shaukat. A lactose-free business has links to the cheese analysis, so we state affiliations and funding on each card.

Sources

  1. Dahlqvist A, Hammond JB, Crane RK, et al. Intestinal lactase deficiency and lactose intolerance in adults. Preliminary report. Gastroenterology. 1963.
  2. Cuatrecasas P, Lockwood DH, Caldwell JR. Lactase deficiency in the adult. A common occurrence. Lancet. 1965.
  3. Simoons FJ. Primary adult lactose intolerance and the milking habit: a problem in biologic and cultural interrelations. II. A culture historical hypothesis. Am J Dig Dis. 1970.
  4. Ingram CJ, Mulcare CA, Itan Y, et al. Lactose digestion and the evolutionary genetics of lactase persistence. Hum Genet. 2009.
  5. Enattah NS, Sahi T, Savilahti E, et al. Identification of a variant associated with adult-type hypolactasia. Nat Genet. 2002.
  6. Tishkoff SA, Reed FA, Ranciaro A, et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat Genet. 2007.
  7. Itan Y, Powell A, Beaumont MA, et al. The origins of lactase persistence in Europe. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009.
  8. Evershed RP, Davey Smith G, Roffet-Salque M, et al. Dairying, diseases and the evolution of lactase persistence in Europe. Nature. 2022.
  9. Bayless TM, Brown E, Paige DM. Lactase non-persistence and lactose intolerance. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017.
  10. Shaukat A, Levitt MD, Taylor BC, et al. Systematic review: effective management strategies for lactose intolerance. Ann Intern Med. 2010.

Frequently asked questions about lactose

What is lactose?

Lactose is the main sugar in milk: one glucose and one galactose joined together, which the enzyme lactase splits in the small intestine. Mature human milk holds about 6.7 to 7.8 g per 100 mL. In our USDA data, a cup (246 g) of semi-skimmed cow’s milk holds 12.3 g. See our pages on sugars, glucose and galactose.

Is lactose intolerance the same as a milk allergy?

No. A milk allergy is an immune response to milk protein, while lactose intolerance is trouble digesting the sugar, with pain, bloating, gas and diarrhea. The NIAID-sponsored guidelines say lactose is not an allergen because the response to it is not immune based. Lactase pills do not help an allergy, so ask a doctor if you suspect one.

How much lactose can someone with lactose intolerance have?

Most adults with lactose malabsorption tolerate 12 to 15 g at a time, about a cup of milk, says a 2010 review of 36 trials. In a blinded trial of 30 people who reported severe intolerance, a cup a day gave only minimal symptoms. Tolerance varies, so try it with food and find your own limit.

Which foods are lowest in lactose?

Aged hard cheeses are lowest: most of 25 protected-origin Italian cheeses held under 10 mg of lactose per kg. Fresh Mozzarella di Bufala held 3,540 mg per kg, and production rules vary, so check each cheese. Yogurt and kefir gave less breath hydrogen than milk, and lactose-free milk has had its lactose split.

Do lactase pills work?

In a crossover trial of 47 adults with lactose intolerance, lactase tablets cut breath hydrogen by 55% against placebo and eased symptoms. The EU authorizes a claim for supplements with at least 4,500 FCC units taken with each lactose-containing meal. The trials are small and short, and we found none comparing brands.

Is lactose-free milk healthier than regular milk?

Not shown. In a blinded trial, a cup of lactose-hydrolyzed milk gave the same symptoms as regular milk. We found no trial showing health benefits of lactose-free milk for people who digest lactose. It is a useful swap for people with symptoms, and the previous US guidelines (2020-2025) list lactose-free products for people who are lactose intolerant.

Why can some adults digest milk and others cannot?

Lactase activity falls after weaning in most people, and a 2017 review puts non-persistence at 65% to 70% of adults worldwide. Adults who keep it carry DNA changes near the lactase gene: C/T-13910 in Europeans and three different changes in Tanzanians, Kenyans and Sudanese. A 2022 study found that how much milk people used in prehistoric Europe did not explain how the European change spread.

Can I get enough calcium if I avoid dairy?

It takes planning: the NIH panel warned that people who avoid dairy may take in too little calcium and vitamin D. The calcium RDA is 1,000 mg a day for adults 19 to 50, and 1,200 mg for women 51 to 70 and everyone over 70. A review found that lactose itself changes calcium absorption little in adults, so the calcium in lactose-free dairy should be absorbed about as well. See calcium.