Foods rich in Trans fats: ground beef, chia seeds and semi-skimmed cows milk

Trans fats

Industrial trans fat raised LDL cholesterol and lowered HDL in controlled trials. The small amounts in dairy and beef show no clear heart risk in cohorts. Here is what 29 studies show, which laws cap it, why a label can say 0 g and how to eat less of it.

Researched and written with Claude, an AI by Anthropic, and reviewed by Gerritjan Boeve. Every study is checked against PubMed.

Trans fat is the name for unsaturated fatty acids with at least one double bond in the trans configuration, as the WHO defines it. The definition also counts conjugated linoleic acid, or CLA. It is one of the dietary fats, and it comes mainly from two places.

Industrial trans fat forms when liquid vegetable oils are partially hydrogenated into solid fats. Hydrogenated fats are rich in elaidic acid (trans-9 18:1) and trans-10 18:1.

Ruminant trans fat forms by bacterial action in the stomach of cows, sheep and goats, so it turns up in their milk, butter and meat. Its main fatty acid is vaccenic acid (trans-11 18:1), which the body converts in part to rumenic acid, a CLA isomer. The WHO notes that the individual isomers in the two kinds are largely the same, but present in different proportions.

Trans fat is the one fat that the WHO says has no known health benefits. In a 1990 trial of 59 people, a diet with 10% of energy as trans fat raised LDL (“bad”) cholesterol and lowered HDL (“good”) cholesterol. A saturated fat diet raised LDL but left HDL unchanged.

Since then, cohort studies (following groups over time) and meta-analyses (pooling many studies) have pointed the same way for the industrial kind. So have the laws that took industrial trans fat out of food.

Most readers do not know that the natural kind is a separate question. Trials that fed ruminant trans fat at the same dose as industrial trans fat found a similar rise in the LDL to HDL ratio. But cohorts link only the industrial kind to coronary heart disease, probably because people eat far less of the natural kind. The WHO’s limit of 1% of energy counts both.

Denmark has capped industrial trans fat since 2004. The US Food and Drug Administration ruled in 2015 that partially hydrogenated oils are not generally recognized as safe. The EU caps trans fat at 2 g per 100 g of fat. This page sets out each side at its real evidence level, with the rules as published.

Health effects of trans fat

The top findings from 29 studies, strongest evidence first

  • ★★★Worse cholesterol ratios than saturated fatIn 60 trials, replacing trans fat improved the total to HDL cholesterol ratio (a heart-risk marker) almost twice as much as replacing saturated fat. In a review of 39 studies, industrial trans fat, ruminant trans fat and CLA each raised the LDL to HDL ratio by a similar amount.
  • ★★Linked to more heart diseaseA review for the World Health Organization found each 2% of energy from trans fat, in place of carbohydrate, went with 24% more coronary events. This figure comes from long-term observational studies.
  • ★★Poorer blood vessel wideningIn 29 healthy volunteers, a 4-week diet with 9.2% of energy from trans fat cut HDL by 21% compared with a saturated fat diet. Arm artery widening was 4.4% after the trans fat diet and 6.2% after the saturated fat diet.
  • ★★Stick margarine lowered LDL only 5% against butterIn 18 women and 18 men, compared with butter, stick margarine lowered LDL only 5%, and soybean oil lowered it 12%. HDL fell 3 to 6% against butter, most on stick margarine, which held the most trans fat.
  • ★★Large amounts of natural trans fat raised LDLIn 38 healthy men, 10.2 g of ruminant trans fat (the naturally occurring kind) per 2,500 kcal raised LDL, but 4.2 g did not. The authors say moderate amounts were neutral.

All 17 studies, strongest evidence first

Replacing trans fat beat replacing saturated fat on the cholesterol ratio

This meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials compared replacing trans fat or saturated fat with a mix of carbohydrates and cis unsaturated fats. Replacing trans fat lowered the total to HDL ratio almost twice as much. The ratio of total to HDL cholesterol is a marker of heart risk, not a heart outcome. Replacing saturated fat with carbohydrates left the ratio unchanged, and replacing it with cis unsaturated fats lowered it. The authors say these effects need confirming in long-term studies or trials. Risk falls most when trans and saturated fats are replaced with cis unsaturated fats, they add.

Mensink et al., 2003, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Trans fat raised LDL 0.37 mmol/L and cut HDL 0.17

34 women and 25 men ate three mixed natural diets with the same nutrients, 3 weeks each, in random order. Mean ages were 26 for the women and 25 for the men. The diets differed only in which fat gave 10% of energy: oleic acid (the comparison), its trans forms or saturated fats. The saturated diet raised LDL by 0.47 mmol/L but left HDL unchanged. So the authors judged trans fat at least as harmful as the cholesterol-raising saturated fats, and effects did not differ between women and men.

Mensink and Katan, 1990, N Engl J Med

How we rate evidence

Stick margarine lowered LDL only 5%, soybean oil 12%, against butter

18 women and 18 men ate six diets for 35 days each, in random order, with 30% of calories as fat. Two thirds of that fat came from soybean oil, semiliquid margarine, soft margarine, shortening, stick margarine or butter. Per 100 g of fat, soybean oil held under 0.5 g of trans fat and semiliquid margarine under 0.5 g. Soft margarine held 7.4 g, shortening 9.9 g and stick margarine 20.1 g. HDL fell 3 to 6% against butter, most on stick margarine. The total to HDL ratio was lowest on soybean oil and semiliquid margarine and highest on stick margarine. The authors conclude that products low in trans and saturated fat have beneficial effects on blood fats.

Lichtenstein et al., 1999, N Engl J Med

How we rate evidence

Trans fat instead of saturated fat cut HDL 21% and artery widening

29 healthy volunteers ate two controlled 4-week diets in random order. The trans diet gave 9.2% of energy as trans fat, which the other diet replaced with saturated fat. Arm artery widening (flow-mediated dilation), a coronary risk marker, was 4.4% after the trans diet and 6.2% after the saturated diet. LDL and triglycerides were stable, and the authors say more studies must test whether the HDL fall caused the impairment.

de Roos et al., 2001, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol

How we rate evidence

Each 2% of energy as trans fat: 24% more coronary events

This review for the WHO Scientific Update weighed controlled feeding trials against long-term observational studies. That figure, from a meta-analysis of long-term studies, is for trans fat in place of carbohydrate. In place of saturated, cis monounsaturated and cis polyunsaturated fat, risk was 20%, 27% and 32% higher. Trials and cohorts agreed on harm to blood fats, inflammation markers and blood vessel linings; effects on weight and diabetes need more confirmation. The authors say ruminant and industrial trans fat act alike in experiments at similar amounts. But few people eat much ruminant trans fat, and observational studies do not support harm at the amounts actually eaten.

Mozaffarian et al., 2009, Eur J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Each 2% of energy as trans fat: 23% more coronary disease

This systematic review in the New England Journal of Medicine was by Mozaffarian, Katan, Ascherio, Stampfer and Willett. It recommended cutting trans fat intake to lower coronary risk. Its estimate for each 2% of energy was 1.23 times the risk, as reported in a 2006 BMJ editorial by Clarke and Lewington.

Mozaffarian et al., 2006, N Engl J Med

How we rate evidence

Industrial trans fat went with 42% more coronary disease; ruminant did not

This meta-analysis pooled one to six long-term cohorts per outcome (12,942 to 230,135 people). Total trans fat went with higher risk of death from any cause (1.34 times), death from coronary heart disease (1.28) and coronary heart disease (1.21). It did not go with ischemic stroke (1.07) or type 2 diabetes (1.10). For coronary heart disease, industrial trans fat gave 1.42 and ruminant 0.93. Certainty for the heart outcomes was graded moderate, and the authors say the difference is probably due to higher intake of industrial trans fat.

de Souza et al., 2015, BMJ

How we rate evidence

The top third of trans fat intake had 16% more coronary risk

The 32 studies of diet covered 530,525 people, comparing the top with the lowest third of intake. Coronary risk was 1.16 times as high for trans fat and 1.02 for saturated fat, which showed no link. In 17 studies of blood markers, circulating trans fat gave 1.05. The paper’s wider conclusion, that evidence does not clearly support guidelines favoring polyunsaturated fat and low saturated fat, drew many published comments. The paper ran no randomized trials of trans fat.

Chowdhury et al., 2014, Ann Intern Med

How we rate evidence

Each 2% of energy as trans fat: 28% more coronary disease

The Zutphen Elderly Study followed 667 Dutch men aged 64 to 84 for 10 years, from 1985 to 1995. There were 98 cases of fatal or non-fatal coronary heart disease. The men ate fairly high amounts of trans fat, including from partly hydrogenated fish oils. Average intake fell from 4.3% to 1.9% of energy over the period. After adjustment, a difference of 2% of energy gave 1.28 times the risk. The authors note that lowering trans fat in Dutch edible fats could have had a large public health impact.

Oomen et al., 2001, Lancet

How we rate evidence

Nurses eating the most trans fat had 50% more heart disease

The Nurses’ Health Study followed 85,095 US women for 8 years, with 431 new cases of non-fatal heart attack or coronary death. Against the bottom fifth, the top fifth had 1.50 times the risk after adjusting for age and energy. Adding other risk factors and fats did not change it much. Margarine, cookies, cake and white bread were each linked to higher risk. The authors say the findings support the idea that partially hydrogenated vegetable oils may contribute to coronary heart disease.

Willett et al., 1993, Lancet

How we rate evidence

Each 2% of energy from trans fat: 39% more type 2 diabetes

The Nurses’ Health Study followed 84,204 US nurses for 14 years, with 2,507 new diabetes cases. Diet questionnaires were updated in 1984, 1986 and 1990. Total, saturated and monounsaturated fat showed no link, while trans fat gave 1.39 times the risk. The authors estimated that swapping 2% of energy from trans fat for polyunsaturated fat would cut risk by 40%. This is an observational result, and the 2015 meta-analysis above found no significant link between total trans fat and type 2 diabetes.

Salmerón et al., 2001, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Counties restricting trans fat had 6.2% fewer heart attack and stroke admissions

This New York State study compared 11 urban counties that restricted trans fat in 2007 to 2011 with 25 similar ones that did not. It covered 2002 to 2013 and looked three or more years after the restrictions. Beyond the general trend, hospital admissions fell an extra 6.2% for heart attack and stroke combined and 7.8% for heart attack. For stroke alone, the 3.6% drop could be chance. The design shows a link, not proof that the restrictions alone caused it.

Brandt et al., 2017, JAMA Cardiol

How we rate evidence

In Denmark, cardiovascular deaths fell about 14.2 per 100,000 a year

This synthetic control analysis compared Danish deaths with a mix of similar OECD countries, from 1990 to 2012. The drop was for the 3 years after the January 2004 trans fat limit. Before the policy, Denmark’s annual mean was 441.5 deaths per 100,000 people, against 442.7 in the comparison group. Denmark was the first country to regulate artificial trans fat in certain ingredients, which nearly removed it from the Danish food supply. This compares whole countries, not individuals, and the first author is affiliated with the US Food and Drug Administration.

Restrepo and Rieger, 2016, Am J Prev Med

How we rate evidence

Fast-food trans fat per purchase fell 2.4 g after the rule

This study compared 6,969 purchases in 2007 and 7,885 in 2009 at 168 restaurants of 11 chains, after the city’s 2006 rule. Purchases with zero grams of trans fat rose from 32% to 59%, while saturated fat rose slightly, by 0.55 g. The benefit did not differ between high- and low-poverty neighborhoods. The authors say federal rules would be needed to fully remove industrial trans fat. The City of New York and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded the study.

Angell et al., 2012, Ann Intern Med

How we rate evidence

About 8% of energy as trans fat gave monkeys more belly fat

For 6 years, 42 male African green monkeys ate cis monounsaturated fat or its trans forms, with calories set to maintain weight. The trans-fed monkeys gained significant weight with more belly fat, had higher insulin after meals and raised fructosamine. They also showed less phosphorylation of muscle Akt, a step in insulin signaling. This is an animal study, and we found no trial in people that tested these effects over years.

Kavanagh et al., 2007, Obesity (Silver Spring)

How we rate evidence

In mouse cells, elaidic acid cut cholesterol efflux about 23%

Mouse and human macrophages (immune cells) were exposed for 34 hours to 70 µM of industrial elaidic acid, ruminant vaccenic acid or palmitic acid. In mouse cells the cut was in ABCA1-driven efflux (cholesterol export), and vaccenic acid had no such effect. In cholesterol-loaded human macrophages, elaidic acid cut efflux by 36%. The authors suggest elaidic acid may stiffen cell membranes, impair the transporter and so promote atherosclerosis; this is cell work, not a feeding study.

Fournier et al., 2012, Biochim Biophys Acta

How we rate evidence

In mice, trans-vaccenic acid strengthened anti-tumor CD8+ T cells

Trans-vaccenic acid is the main ruminant trans fat, and a screen of blood nutrients singled it out. It blocks the cell-surface receptor GPR43 and switches on a signaling chain (cAMP, PKA, CREB) in these immune cells. The paper notes that people convert only around 19% of dietary vaccenic acid to rumenic acid, against 12% in mice. It reports no human trial, and one of the corresponding authors has patents pending on vaccenic acid and its derivatives.

Fan et al., 2023, Nature

How we rate evidence

Foods high in trans fat

Trans fat in our USDA ranking comes only from whole foods, in small natural amounts. Per serving, ground beef leads with 1.33 g in 4 oz (113 g). Semi-skimmed cow’s milk follows with 0.21 g in 1 cup (246 g), then a chicken drumstick with skin with 0.06 g.

Chia seeds, shrimp and eggs come next; the ranking shows their amounts. Per 100 g, ground beef leads (1.18 g), then chia seeds (0.14 g) and milk (0.09 g). Per 100 kcal, ground beef (0.46 g) and milk (0.17 g) lead.

The ranking holds whole foods only. It does not show margarine, shortening or packaged baked goods, so it is not a measure of industrial trans fat.

For scale, the WHO’s limit of 1% of energy is less than 2.2 g a day on 2,000 kcal. A 4 oz serving of ground beef at 1.33 g is about 60% of that figure. A cup of milk at 0.21 g is about 10% (our arithmetic).

The WHO’s limit counts ruminant trans fat. But its guideline says the recommendations do not preclude eating particular foods, while foods high in industrially produced trans fat should largely be avoided.

Per serving. No daily amount is set, so bars compare each food with the top food.

Per 100 g. No daily amount is set, so bars compare each food with the top food.

Per 100 kcal: the same calories of each food, for a fair comparison. Bars compare each food with the top food.

Food labels have no Daily Value or Reference Intake for trans fat, so the % compares each food with the top food.

  1. 1.Ground beefPoultry and Meats · per 4 oz (113 g)1.33 g
  2. 2.Semi-skimmed cows milkEggs and Dairy · per 1 cup (246 g)0.21 g
  3. 3.Chicken drumstickPoultry and Meats · per 1 drumstick with skin (133 g)0.06 g
  4. 4.Chia seedsNuts and Seeds · per 1 oz (28 g)0.04 g
  5. 5.ShrimpSeafood · per 3 oz (85 g)0.03 g
  6. 6.EggsEggs and Dairy · per 1 large (50 g)0.02 g
  7. 7.Pumpkin seedsNuts and Seeds · per 1 oz (28 g)0.02 g
  8. 8.Chicken breastPoultry and Meats · per 4 oz (113 g)0.01 g
  9. 9.ClovesHerbs and spices · per 1 tsp (2.1 g)0.01 g
  10. 10.AlmondsNuts and Seeds · per 1 oz (28 g)0.004 g
  1. 1.Ground beefPoultry and Meats1.18 g
  2. 2.Chia seedsNuts and Seeds0.14 g
  3. 3.Semi-skimmed cows milkEggs and Dairy0.09 g
  4. 4.Pumpkin seedsNuts and Seeds0.06 g
  5. 5.Chicken drumstickPoultry and Meats0.05 g
  6. 6.EggsEggs and Dairy0.04 g
  7. 7.ShrimpSeafood0.04 g
  8. 8.AlmondsNuts and Seeds0.02 g
  9. 9.Chicken breastPoultry and Meats0.01 g
  10. 10.ScallopsSeafood0.01 g
  1. 1.Ground beefPoultry and Meats0.46 g
  2. 2.Semi-skimmed cows milkEggs and Dairy0.17 g
  3. 3.ShrimpSeafood0.03 g
  4. 4.Chicken drumstickPoultry and Meats0.03 g
  5. 5.Chia seedsNuts and Seeds0.03 g
  6. 6.EggsEggs and Dairy0.03 g
  7. 7.Pumpkin seedsNuts and Seeds0.01 g
  8. 8.ScallopsSeafood0.01 g
  9. 9.Chicken breastPoultry and Meats0.01 g
  10. 10.AlmondsNuts and Seeds0.003 g

Industrial trans fat is a matter of labels and laws more than USDA numbers. The WHO lists margarine, vegetable shortening, vanaspati ghee, fried foods and baked goods such as crackers, biscuits and pies. It says baked and fried street and restaurant foods often contain it.

The FDA calls partially hydrogenated oils the main dietary source of industrial trans fat. It adds that all refined edible oils hold some trans fat as an unintended byproduct, typically below 2 percent. Fully hydrogenated oils can also hold under 2 percent, and the fat of dairy and meat from ruminants typically about 3 percent.

The WHO puts the trans fat in partially hydrogenated oil at 25 to 45% on average. It says frying oil at high temperatures adds only a modest amount, up to 2 to 3%.

Two studies show what packaged foods held in the past and what blood tests have found more recently.

All 2 studies, strongest evidence first

Danish high-trans menus fell from 30 g to under 1 g

In 2004 to 2006, researchers bought 55 servings of fries and chicken nuggets and 87 packages of microwave popcorn. They also bought 393 samples of biscuits, cakes and wafers listing partially hydrogenated vegetable fat, in Denmark and 25 other countries. The “high trans menu” was a large serving of fries and nuggets, 100 g of popcorn and 100 g of biscuits, wafers or cakes. The Danish drop ran from 2001 to 2005. The menu held more than 20 g in 17 of 18 countries, including 36 g in the US and 42 g in Hungary. These 2004 to 2006 data predate the US and EU limits. The authors saw no noticeable effect of the Danish law on availability, price or quality.

Stender et al., 2006, Atheroscler Suppl

How we rate evidence

Share of samples with high trans fat rose from 2.12% to 7.21%

One European lab tested red blood cell fatty acids in 20,510 samples (2024), 27,834 (2025) and 18,577 in the first half of 2026. High meant industrial trans fat above 1.04% of fatty acids, a level the authors link to higher mortality. The rise came only from trans 18:1, which they assume is mainly elaidic acid, found for example in adulterated olive oil. That source is an assumption, not a measurement. Both authors work for Omegametrix, the commercial lab that produced the data, and the samples are not a random sample of the population.

von Schacky and Passow, 2026, Eur J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. FoodData Central. Values as shown in the ranking above.
  2. World Health Organization. Trans fat (fact sheet). 24 January 2024.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils. Federal Register 80 FR 34650. 17 June 2015.
  4. World Health Organization. Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline. Geneva. 2023. See also the WHO news release of 17 July 2023.
  5. Stender S, Dyerberg J, Bysted A, Leth T, Astrup A. A trans world journey. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006.
  6. von Schacky C, Passow A. Increasing levels of industrially derived trans fatty acids in European erythrocytes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2026.

How trans fat works

Most of what is known comes from controlled feeding trials in people, plus cell and animal work. Four ideas cover it. They are the shape of the molecule and what it does to LDL, HDL and a lipid-transfer protein. Then come its effects on cells and arteries, and what has been seen in people.

The WHO’s guideline says the harm is believed to occur mainly through blood fats, with inflammation among other possible routes.

A trans double bond keeps the chain closer to straight

In a cis fat such as oleic acid, the double bond bends the chain. A trans bond bends it much less, so the molecule resembles a saturated fat. A 1997 review calls the artificial isomers structurally similar to saturated fats.

In model membranes, a lipid with elaidic acid (trans) melted at 31.5 °C. That is between the 7 °C of the oleic acid (cis) lipid and the 53 °C of the all-stearic acid (saturated) lipid. The authors link the smaller drop to the smaller bend in the chain. They speculate that this shape may play a role in the harm of dietary trans fat.

Chain-melting temperature of model membranes, °CEach lipid has stearic acid on one chainTwo stearic acid chains (saturated)53 °CElaidic acid + stearic acid (trans)31.5 °COleic acid + stearic acid (cis)7 °C

Temperature at which three model membrane lipids melt, in °C, drawn to scale from zero. Each has stearic acid on one chain and the named acid on the other. These are lab membranes, not people.

Soni et al., 2009, Biochemistry

How we rate evidence

It raises LDL, lowers HDL and raises a transfer protein

In the 1990 trial, 10% of energy as trans fat raised LDL by 0.37 mmol/L against oleic acid. It cut HDL by 0.17 mmol/L. Saturated fat raised LDL by 0.47 mmol/L but left HDL unchanged. That is why the authors judged trans fat at least as harmful.

Change in cholesterol (mmol/L) compared with anoleic acid diet, in 34 women and 25 menLDL cholesterolTrans fat diet+0.37Saturated fat diet+0.47HDL cholesterolTrans fat diet−0.17Saturated fat diet0.00 (no change)

Change in LDL and HDL cholesterol in mmol/L compared with an oleic acid diet, from a 3-week crossover trial, drawn to scale. Zero is the line at left.

Mensink and Katan, 1990, N Engl J Med

How we rate evidence

One link between the two changes is the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), which moves cholesteryl esters from HDL to lighter lipoproteins. In a 9-week study of three controlled diets in 55 volunteers, CETP activity averaged 114 after a high trans fat diet. Measured as a percent of a reference serum, it was 96 after linoleic acid and 97 after stearic acid.

In 27 men, activity was 23.95% on an elaidic acid-rich diet and 19.61% on an oleic acid diet. The rise was correlated with the fall in HDL cholesterol (r = −0.57). The authors say the higher activity may contribute to the lipid changes, not that it explains all of them.

Transfer protein (CETP) activity in serum, percentof a reference serum, 55 volunteersHigh trans fat diet114Linoleic acid diet96Stearic acid diet97

CETP activity after three controlled diets in a 9-week study of 55 volunteers, as percent of a reference serum, drawn to scale from zero.

van Tol et al., 1995, Atherosclerosis

How we rate evidence

It changes how cells and arteries behave

In the 29-volunteer trial on the cards above, replacing saturated fat with trans fat cut arm artery widening from 6.2% to 4.4%. A 2006 review of observational and experimental studies found trans fat to be pro-inflammatory and to harm blood vessel linings (endothelial dysfunction). It said the mechanisms are not well established, but may involve incorporation into cell membranes or effects on the PPAR and RXR pathways.

In macrophages, elaidic acid, but not vaccenic acid, reduced cholesterol efflux through ABCA1. In monkeys fed trans fat for 6 years, weight gain and belly fat rose even though calories were set to maintain weight. Both are on the cards above, as lab work.

What has been seen in people

The trials show the lipid effects, and no trial has tested trans fat against heart attacks. So the heart disease evidence comes from cohorts. The 2015 meta-analysis split them by source. Industrial trans fat went with more coronary heart disease and more deaths from it, and ruminant trans fat did not.

Relative risk, highest vs lowest trans fat intakeLine at 1.0 = no linkHeart disease, industrial trans fat1.42Heart disease, ruminant trans fat0.93Death from heart disease, industrial1.18Death from heart disease, ruminant1.01

Pooled relative risk for the highest versus the lowest trans fat intake, drawn to scale from zero. The line marks 1.0, no link. The 95% intervals are 1.05 to 1.92 and 0.73 to 1.18 for heart disease, and 1.04 to 1.33 and 0.71 to 1.43 for death from it (industrial, then ruminant).

de Souza et al., 2015, BMJ

How we rate evidence

Putting the cards together: in feeding trials trans fat raised LDL, lowered HDL and worsened the total to HDL ratio. It also stiffened artery function in one crossover trial. Cohorts link industrial trans fat to coronary heart disease. The New York and Denmark studies saw fewer cardiovascular events after the limits, though they cannot prove the limits alone caused it.

The WHO graded the certainty that lower trans fat intake reduces cardiovascular disease as moderate. It graded the certainty that replacing it with polyunsaturated or monounsaturated fat lowers LDL as high. Ruminant trans fat is harder. The trials suggest it raises LDL at high doses, and the cohorts, which cover much lower intakes, find no clear link.

Sources

  1. Soni SP, Ward JA, Sen SE, Feller SE, Wassall SR. Effect of trans unsaturation on molecular organization in a phospholipid membrane. Biochemistry. 2009.
  2. Ascherio A, Willett WC. Health effects of trans fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997.
  3. Mensink RP, Katan MB. Effect of dietary trans fatty acids on high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in healthy subjects. N Engl J Med. 1990.
  4. van Tol A, Zock PL, van Gent T, Scheek LM, Katan MB. Dietary trans fatty acids increase serum cholesterylester transfer protein activity in man. Atherosclerosis. 1995.
  5. Abbey M, Nestel PJ. Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity is increased when trans-elaidic acid is substituted for cis-oleic acid in the diet. Atherosclerosis. 1994.
  6. de Roos NM, Bots ML, Katan MB. Replacement of dietary saturated fatty acids by trans fatty acids lowers serum HDL cholesterol and impairs endothelial function in healthy men and women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001.
  7. Mozaffarian D. Trans fatty acids: effects on systemic inflammation and endothelial function. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006.
  8. Fournier N, Attia N, Rousseau-Ralliard D, et al. Deleterious impact of elaidic fatty acid on ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux from mouse and human macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012.
  9. Kavanagh K, Jones KL, Sawyer J, et al. Trans fat diet induces abdominal obesity and changes in insulin sensitivity in monkeys. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007.
  10. de Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2015.
  11. World Health Organization. Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline. Geneva. 2023. See also the WHO news release of 17 July 2023.

How much trans fat is too much?

The WHO advises keeping trans fat to 1% of daily energy or less. That is less than 2.2 g a day on a 2,000-calorie diet. The US National Academies and EFSA (the EU’s food safety agency) advise keeping it as low as possible.

No amount is known to be needed. The WHO states that trans fat has no known health benefits, so there is no daily need to meet and no deficiency to watch for. The 1% figure is a ceiling, not a target. The FDA said in 2015 that it did not agree that a threshold below which partially hydrogenated oils are safe had been identified.

SourceGroupValueNotes
WHO guideline 2023, recommendations 1 and 2Adults and children (the WHO’s release says everyone aged 2 and older)“reduce trans-fatty acid intake to 1% of total energy intake” (strong recommendation). “further reducing trans-fatty acid intake to less than 1% of total energy intake” (conditional recommendation).Moderate certainty evidence for recommendation 1 and low for recommendation 2. The definition covers every fatty acid with a double bond in the trans configuration, from ruminant or industrial sources, including CLA. The WHO’s fact sheet (24 January 2024) puts 1% at “less than 2.2 g per day for a 2000-calorie diet”.
WHO guideline 2023, recommendation 3Replacement nutrientsReplace trans fat with polyunsaturated fatty acids or monounsaturated fatty acids “primarily from plant sources” (conditional recommendation).The guideline says replacing trans fat with saturated fat did not improve disease outcomes or blood lipids, so saturated fat is not a preferred replacement.
EFSA 2010, dietary reference values for fatsGeneral population“trans fatty acid intake should be as low as possible”EFSA gives no number. The EU Commission’s Regulation (EU) 2019/649 records that EFSA concluded in 2009 that intake “should be as low as possible within the context of a nutritionally adequate diet” and again in a 2018 technical assistance that intakes “should be as low as possible”.
Institute of Medicine (National Academies) 2005General population“As low as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet”As listed in Health Canada’s table of macronutrient reference values. The FDA describes the recommendation as limiting trans fat as much as possible while recognizing that naturally occurring trans fat is unavoidable in ordinary, non-vegan diets without significant dietary adjustments.
FAO/WHO expert consultation 2010Adults“a mean population intake of TFA of less than 1%E”The experts acknowledged that this recommendation “might need to be revised” because it does not fully take into account the distribution of intakes and the need to protect subgroups with very high intakes.
Gram values for percent-of-energy figures are our arithmetic: 1% × 2,000 kcal = 20 kcal, and 20 kcal ÷ 9 kcal per gram of fat is about 2.2 g. At 1,500 kcal the same figure is about 1.7 g. Quotation marks show wording as published.

What do people actually eat? A review of surveys in 29 countries put total trans fat intake between 0.3% and 4.2% of energy, with seven countries above the WHO’s 1%. In 16 of 21 countries with data on sources, intake from animal sources was higher than from industrial sources.

Time trends from 20 countries showed large drops in industrial trans fat since 1995. Two authors work for Unilever, which markets margarines and dressings. A 2022 review reports that in EU member states trans fat provides on average less than 1% of energy. Intakes are marginally above recommendations mainly among young adults.

Sources

  1. World Health Organization. Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline. Geneva. 2023. See also the WHO news release of 17 July 2023.
  2. World Health Organization. Trans fat (fact sheet). 24 January 2024.
  3. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for fats, including saturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, and cholesterol. EFSA J. 2010.
  4. Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/649 of 24 April 2019 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 as regards trans fat, other than trans fat naturally occurring in fat of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union, L 110, 25 April 2019, p. 17.
  5. Institute of Medicine (now part of the National Academies). Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. National Academies Press. 2005. The recommendation is as listed in Health Canada’s table of macronutrient reference values.
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils. Federal Register 80 FR 34650. 17 June 2015.
  7. FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition: report of an expert consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 91. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010.
  8. Wanders AJ, Zock PL, Brouwer IA. Trans fat intake and its dietary sources in general populations worldwide: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2017.
  9. Niforou A, Magriplis E, Klinaki E, Niforou K, Naska A. On account of trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease risk: there is still need to upgrade the knowledge and educate consumers. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022.

Forms of trans fat: industrial and natural

Trans fat reaches people in partially hydrogenated oils and in the fat of milk and meat from ruminants. It also comes in small amounts in refined and fried oils, and as CLA in supplements. The honest bottom line is that for blood fats the source matters less than the dose.

In the quantitative review, each 1% of energy raised the LDL to HDL ratio by 0.055 for industrial trans fat. For ruminant trans fat it was 0.038, and that difference was not statistically significant.

Where the sources differ is in how much people eat. The 2004 to 2006 fast-food survey found over 20 g of industrial trans fat in one menu in 17 of 18 countries. The ruminant intakes in the cohorts were 0.5 to 1.9 g a day.

Popular claims need a caveat. We found no authorized health claim for any trans fat and no trial of vaccenic acid supplements in people. For trans-palmitoleic acid we found only a small trial that raised the blood level without a health result. Studies of CLA used capsules, which are a different exposure from the CLA in dairy fat.

FormWhat it isWhat studies showSource
Partially hydrogenated oils (shortening, hard margarine, frying fat)Vegetable or fish oils hydrogenated but not to complete saturation. Rich in elaidic acid (trans-9 18:1) and trans-10 18:1.The WHO puts the trans fat in partially hydrogenated oil at 25 to 45% on average, and Stender and colleagues at up to 60% of the fatty acids. In a feeding trial, LDL cholesterol fell only 5% with stick margarine (20.1 g of trans fat per 100 g of fat), against 12% with soybean oil. The FDA ruled these oils not generally recognized as safe in 2015.1, 2, 3, 4, 6
Fully hydrogenated oilsHydrogenated to complete or near complete saturation (iodine value of 4 or less, in the FDA’s definition).The FDA says they typically hold below 2 percent trans fat from incomplete hydrogenation, and left them outside its 2015 order.1
Refined and fried oilsNon-hydrogenated vegetable oils, refined at high temperature or used for frying.The FDA says refined oils typically hold below 2 percent trans fat as an unintentional byproduct. The WHO says frying oil at high temperatures adds a modest amount, up to 2 to 3%.1, 2
Interesterified and fractionated fatsReplacement fats made by rearranging or separating fats rather than hydrogenating them.A 2006 account by an employee of a fat producer says the industry moved from selective hydrogenation to fractionation and interesterification without significant changes in raw material cost. Trials of such fats are on our page on stearic acid.5
Ruminant trans fat (vaccenic acid)Trans-11 18:1, formed in the rumen. Found in milk, butter and meat. The body converts about 19% of it to rumenic acid.The FDA puts trans fat at typically about 3 percent of the fat in ruminant dairy and meat, and Stender and colleagues at generally no more than 6%. LDL cholesterol rose at 10.2 to 12 g a day in two trials but not at 4.2 g per 2,500 kcal. Cohorts show no clear link with heart disease.1, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
CLA (rumenic acid, cis-9,trans-11; and trans-10,cis-12)Conjugated linoleic acids, with conjugated trans bonds. Rumenic acid is the natural ruminant isomer; some trials gave purified trans-10,cis-12.In a quantitative review CLA raised the LDL to HDL ratio by 0.043 per 1% of energy. In one trial cis-9,trans-11 lowered the ratio and trans-10,cis-12 raised it. At a median 3.2 g a day, supplements gave a modest loss of body fat. The WHO’s trans fat definition includes CLA; the FDA’s 2015 order does not apply to it.1, 7, 14, 15, 16
Trans-palmitoleic acid (trans-16:1 n-7)A trans fatty acid in dairy fat, used as a blood marker of dairy fat intake.Higher blood levels went with lower diabetes in a cohort (hazard ratios 0.41 and 0.38) and in a pooled analysis (risk ratio 0.58). A supplement trial in 13 adults raised the level but changed no glucose or lipid measure.11, 17, 18
Source numbers refer to the list below. Percentages of trans fat are ranges published by different sources and methods. Cohort links are associations.

Here are the form-specific studies, strongest evidence first, 10 in all.

All 10 studies, strongest evidence first

Industrial and ruminant trans fat and CLA all raised LDL to HDL

This review of 39 intervention studies recalculated each as if the fat replaced cis monounsaturated fat for the same calories. It had 29 treatments with industrial trans fat, 6 with ruminant trans fat and 17 with CLA. For each 1% of energy, the ratio rose by 0.055 for industrial, 0.038 for ruminant and 0.043 for CLA, with no significant difference between them. Only 6 ruminant treatments were available, so that estimate is less precise.

Brouwer et al., 2010, PLoS One

How we rate evidence

CLA supplements cut body fat about 0.09 kg a week over placebo

This meta-analysis pooled 18 placebo-controlled trials of CLA supplements at a median 3.2 g a day. They used a mix of isomers or purified trans-10,cis-12 CLA, and measured body composition with a validated method. The effect grew with treatment length for up to 6 months, then slowly leveled off by 2 years. Trials comparing isomers were inconclusive, the authors call the fat loss modest, and CLA in capsules is a different exposure from CLA in dairy fat.

Whigham et al., 2007, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Natural trans fat raised women’s HDL, and their LDL, versus industrial

In this randomized, double-blind crossover trial (TRANSFACT), 46 healthy people started and 40 finished (19 men, 21 women). Foods gave 11 to 12 g a day of trans fat, about 5% of energy, from industrial or natural sources. Against industrial trans fat, natural trans fat raised HDL and also LDL in women only, with no changes in men. The authors say the HDL-lowering effect seems specific to industrial sources, but no conclusion on absolute heart risk can be drawn in these healthy people.

Chardigny et al., 2008, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

10.2 g of ruminant trans fat raised LDL; 4.2 g did not

38 healthy men ate four 4-week diets in random order, without knowing which. Per 2,500 kcal they held high ruminant trans fat (10.2 g), moderate ruminant (4.2), high industrial (10.2) or a low-trans control (2.2). LDL was higher after the high ruminant diet than after the control and the moderate diet. The industrial diet also raised it above the moderate ruminant diet. HDL was lower after the high ruminant than the moderate diet. The authors say moderate ruminant intakes, well above current human consumption, were neutral.

Motard-Bélanger et al., 2008, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

CLA isomers had opposite effects on the LDL to HDL ratio

Healthy men took 1, 2 and then 4 capsules of 80% cis-9,trans-11 or 80% trans-10,cis-12 CLA, 8 weeks each. That gave 0.59 to 2.38 g and 0.63 to 2.52 g a day, with a 6-week washout before the other isomer. The cis-9,trans-11 form lowered the LDL to HDL ratio, while the trans-10,cis-12 form raised it. Plasma triacylglycerol was also higher on trans-10,cis-12 CLA. Body composition and insulin resistance markers did not change. Other trials used mixtures of isomers, so a result for one isomer does not describe a mixed product.

Tricon et al., 2004, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

People converted about 19% of vaccenic acid to rumenic acid

30 healthy adults ate an oleic acid-rich baseline diet for 2 weeks, with nearly all food provided. Then three groups of 10 ate 1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 g of vaccenic acid a day for 9 days. Blood vaccenic acid rose by 94%, 307% and 620%, and the conversion rate varied a lot between people. Urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2alpha, a marker the authors measured, rose in all groups. The study is short, and it did not measure heart disease risk.

Turpeinen et al., 2002, Am J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

Trans-palmitoleic oil raised blood levels 26.6%, changing no glucose or lipid

In this randomized, double-blind crossover trial, 13 healthy adults took seabuckthorn oil enriched in trans-palmitoleic acid. Doses rose from 120 to 240 to 480 mg a day, 3 weeks each, with a 4-week washout. The rise in blood phospholipids was at the top dose. Blood glucose, insulin and fats did not change significantly, though the study was not powered to detect such effects, and no adverse effects were seen. It shows that supplements can raise the level, not that they bring a health benefit.

Huang et al., 2020, J Nutr

How we rate evidence

Ruminant trans fat studies: small, inconclusive and often at unreachable doses

The review covered population, clinical and mechanism studies of vaccenic acid and cis-9,trans-11 CLA. Some cohorts link coronary risk only with industrial forms, and some trials may have been too small to detect effects. Links between industrial trans fat and cancer are inconsistent, and no clinical studies have tested cause and effect for cancer. The authors report no conflicts of interest and call for more research in people.

Gebauer et al., 2011, Adv Nutr

How we rate evidence

Ruminant trans fat had no clear heart disease link; industrial was borderline

Pooling six published and two unpublished long-term cohorts, ruminant trans fat gave 0.92 times the risk, a link that could be chance. Comparing extreme fifths of total trans fat, coronary events were 1.22 times as likely and fatal coronary disease 1.24 times. For industrial trans fat it was 1.21, a borderline result. Ruminant intakes differed by only 0.5 to 1.9 g a day, so the null result may reflect low intake. The authors say too few studies prevent firm conclusions on whether the source matters.

Bendsen et al., 2011, Eur J Clin Nutr

How we rate evidence

High blood trans-palmitoleate, a dairy marker, went with about 60% less diabetes

The Cardiovascular Health Study followed 3,736 older US adults from 1992 to 2006, with 304 new diabetes cases. The fourth and fifth fifths of trans-palmitoleate, against the lowest, had 0.41 and 0.38 times the risk; residual confounding is possible. Whole-fat dairy was the strongest dietary predictor of trans-palmitoleate, and higher levels also went with lower triglycerides and less insulin resistance. Harvard University has filed a provisional patent application for trans-16:1n-7 in insulin resistance and diabetes. It names three of the authors as inventors.

Mozaffarian et al., 2010, Ann Intern Med

How we rate evidence

Sources

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils. Federal Register 80 FR 34650. 17 June 2015.
  2. World Health Organization. Trans fat (fact sheet). 24 January 2024.
  3. Stender S, Astrup A, Dyerberg J. Ruminant and industrially produced trans fatty acids: health aspects. Food Nutr Res. 2008.
  4. Gómez-Cortés P, de la Fuente MÁ, Juárez M. Trans fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in food: origin and biological properties (article in Spanish, abstract in English). Nutr Hosp. 2019.
  5. Nielsen K. Is the quality and cost of food affected if industrially produced trans fatty acids are removed?. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006.
  6. Lichtenstein AH, Ausman LM, Jalbert SM, Schaefer EJ. Effects of different forms of dietary hydrogenated fats on serum lipoprotein cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1999.
  7. Brouwer IA, Wanders AJ, Katan MB. Effect of animal and industrial trans fatty acids on HDL and LDL cholesterol levels in humans: a quantitative review. PLoS One. 2010.
  8. Chardigny JM, Destaillats F, Malpuech-Brugère C, et al. Do trans fatty acids from industrially produced sources and from natural sources have the same effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy subjects? Results of the trans Fatty Acids Collaboration (TRANSFACT) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008.
  9. Motard-Bélanger A, Charest A, Grenier G, et al. Study of the effect of trans fatty acids from ruminants on blood lipids and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008.
  10. Bendsen NT, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Astrup A. Consumption of industrial and ruminant trans fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011.
  11. de Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2015.
  12. Turpeinen AM, Mutanen M, Aro A, et al. Bioconversion of vaccenic acid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002.
  13. Gebauer SK, Chardigny JM, Jakobsen MU, et al. Effects of ruminant trans fatty acids on cardiovascular disease and cancer: a comprehensive review of epidemiological, clinical, and mechanistic studies. Adv Nutr. 2011.
  14. Tricon S, Burdge GC, Kew S, et al. Opposing effects of cis-9,trans-11 and trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid on blood lipids in healthy humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004.
  15. Whigham LD, Watras AC, Schoeller DA. Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid for reducing fat mass: a meta-analysis in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007.
  16. World Health Organization. Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline. Geneva. 2023. See also the WHO news release of 17 July 2023.
  17. Mozaffarian D, Cao H, King IB, et al. Trans-palmitoleic acid, metabolic risk factors, and new-onset diabetes in U.S. adults: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010.
  18. Huang NK, Matthan NR, Galluccio JM, et al. Supplementation with seabuckthorn oil augmented in 16:1n-7t increases serum trans-palmitoleic acid in metabolically healthy adults: a randomized crossover dose-escalation study. J Nutr. 2020.

Is trans fat safe? Limits and who should watch it

No intake of industrial trans fat is known to be safe or needed. The limits below are limits on what foods may contain, and they differ by region. Quotation marks show the wording as published.

The studies that evaluated them are on the cards above. They are Denmark (Restrepo and Rieger), New York City (Angell, Brandt) and the 2004 to 2006 fast-food survey.

RuleWhereWording as publishedNotes
Danish Order no. 160, March 2003DenmarkA maximum of 2 g of industrially produced trans fat per 100 g of fat (a description of the order in a 2006 Danish report, not the order’s own text).In force from January 2004, and the first national limit of its kind, according to the WHO. Trans fat in foods such as French fries, microwave popcorn and bakery products was reduced or removed, according to the same Danish report.
New York City Board of HealthNew York CityRequired that artificial trans fat be phased out of restaurant food (a description by the city health department authors).Adopted December 2006. By November 2008 the restriction was in full effect, and the authors estimate restaurant use of artificial trans fat for frying, baking, cooking or in spreads fell from 50% to under 2%.
FDA final determination on partially hydrogenated oilsUnited States“there is no longer a consensus among qualified experts that partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), which are the primary dietary source of industrially-produced trans fatty acids (IP-TFA) are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for any use in human food”Federal Register 80 FR 34650, 17 June 2015 (the FDA’s page says it was released on 16 June 2015). The order set the compliance date at “June 18, 2018”. The FDA later extended it: foods made with non-petitioned uses of PHOs before 18 June 2018 had until January 1, 2020, and the petitioned uses until June 18, 2019 for manufacturing and January 1, 2021 for distribution. The order does not apply to naturally occurring trans fat, to fully hydrogenated oils or to CLA. In 2023 the FDA issued a direct final rule to remove outdated references to PHOs.
Regulation (EU) 2019/649, Article 1European Union“The content of trans fat, other than trans fat naturally occurring in fat of animal origin, in food intended for the final consumer and food intended for supply to retail, shall not exceed 2 grams per 100 grams of fat.”Adopted 24 April 2019 and published in the Official Journal on 25 April 2019. It entered into force on the twentieth day after publication, and “Food which does not comply with this Regulation may continue to be placed on the market until 1 April 2021.” Article 2 requires suppliers to other food businesses to pass on the amount where it exceeds 2 grams per 100 grams of fat.
Nutrition labeling, 21 CFR 101.9(c)(2)(ii)United States“If the serving contains less than 0.5 gram, the content, when declared, shall be expressed as zero.”Trans fat is given in grams per serving “to the nearest 0.5 (1⁄2)-gram increment below 5 grams”. Declaration is not required for products with less than 0.5 gram of total fat in a serving if no claims are made about fat, fatty acid or cholesterol content. The FDA has required trans fat on the Nutrition Facts label since January 2006.
WHO REPLACE action packageGlobalBest-practice policies: a “mandatory national limit of 2 grams of industrially produced trans fat per 100 grams of total fat in all foods” or a “mandatory national ban on the production or use of partially hydrogenated oils (a major source of trans fat) as an ingredient in all foods”.REPLACE was released on 14 May 2018, with six actions: review, promote, legislate, assess, create awareness and enforce. The WHO’s plan for 2019 to 2023 lists eliminating industrially produced trans fat as a priority target, and its fact sheet (24 January 2024) says almost half of the world’s population is covered by best-practice policies.
Where a rule is described in our words, the source is a scientific report on it. The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/649 and of 21 CFR 101.9 is quoted from the official versions.

The “0 g” rule deserves a note. In its 2015 order, the FDA said natural trans fat is only likely to reach 0.5 g per serving in products with partially hydrogenated oils.

Several servings of a food that rounds down to zero can still add up. Five servings that each hold just under 0.5 g would give almost 2.5 g, more than the WHO’s 2.2 g (our arithmetic).

  • People with raised LDL cholesterol or heart disease. Everyone is advised to keep trans fat low, so there is no reason to eat more of it. The lipid trials in this page were in healthy volunteers and lasted 3 to 5 weeks. Ask a doctor or dietitian about the rest of your fat intake.
  • People who live or eat where no rule exists. The WHO says action is needed in low- and middle-income countries, where controls on industrial trans fat are often weaker. It says baked and fried street and restaurant foods often contain it. The 2004 to 2006 survey found more than 20 g in one menu in 17 of 18 countries.
  • Natural trans fat in dairy and meat. The WHO’s 1% limit includes it and the FDA’s 2015 order does not. The cohorts show no clear link with heart disease at usual intakes (0.92 and 0.93 times the risk). In a 38-man trial, 4.2 g per 2,500 kcal was neutral while 10.2 g raised LDL cholesterol. The WHO’s guideline says its recommendations do not preclude eating particular foods.
  • CLA supplements. The WHO counts CLA in its definition of trans fat, and the FDA does not apply its 2015 order to CLA. In one trial the trans-10,cis-12 isomer raised the LDL to HDL ratio. Supplements at 3.2 g a day gave only a modest loss of body fat. We found no study that tested CLA supplements against heart disease.

How to eat less trans fat

  • Check the ingredient list for “partially hydrogenated” oil. The FDA calls these oils the primary dietary source of industrial trans fat. The WHO suggests avoiding them in fried and baked foods when they are labeled.
  • Do not rely on “0 g” alone. A serving can hold up to just under 0.5 g and still be labeled zero. So look for the ingredient and watch how many servings you eat.
  • Cook with liquid oils. The WHO’s guideline advises replacing trans fat with polyunsaturated fats or monounsaturated fats from plants, and not with saturated fat. Be most careful with fried street and restaurant food where no rule applies.

Sources

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils. Federal Register 80 FR 34650. 17 June 2015.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils (removing trans fat). Web page, content current as of 1 October 2024.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Trans fat. Web page, content current as of 30 April 2024.
  4. Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/649 of 24 April 2019 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 as regards trans fat, other than trans fat naturally occurring in fat of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union, L 110, 25 April 2019, p. 17.
  5. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods. Official Journal of the European Union. 2012.
  6. U.S. Government. 21 CFR 101.9, Nutrition labeling of food, paragraph (c)(2)(ii). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, up to date as of 22 October 2026.
  7. World Health Organization. Trans fat (fact sheet). 24 January 2024.
  8. World Health Organization. WHO plan to eliminate industrially-produced trans-fatty acids from global food supply. News release, 14 May 2018.
  9. World Health Organization. Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline. Geneva. 2023. See also the WHO news release of 17 July 2023.
  10. Leth T, Jensen HG, Mikkelsen AA, Bysted A. The effect of the regulation on trans fatty acid content in Danish food. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006.
  11. Restrepo BJ, Rieger M. Denmark’s policy on artificial trans fat and cardiovascular disease. Am J Prev Med. 2016.
  12. Angell SY, Silver LD, Goldstein GP, et al. Cholesterol control beyond the clinic: New York City’s trans fat restriction. Ann Intern Med. 2009.

History of trans fat

Partially hydrogenated oils entered the food supply in the early 20th century as a replacement for butter, according to the WHO. They became more popular in the 1950s through 1970s, after the negative health effects of saturated fats were discovered. The first controlled test of their effect on lipoproteins came in 1990. Mensink and Katan reported that trans isomers of oleic acid raised LDL and lowered HDL cholesterol in 59 people.

In 1993 Willett and colleagues reported on 85,095 nurses. The top fifth of trans fat intake had 1.50 times the risk of coronary heart disease. By 1997 Ascherio and Willett estimated, conservatively, that 30,000 premature deaths a year in the US were attributable to trans fat. They wrote that consumption should be minimized and information on content made available to consumers.

The rules followed. Denmark issued its order in March 2003, and the limit took effect in January 2004. The FDA published its labeling rule on 11 July 2003 (68 FR 41434) and required trans fat on the Nutrition Facts label from January 2006. In December 2006 the New York City Board of Health required artificial trans fat to be phased out of restaurant food.

The FDA announced a tentative determination on partially hydrogenated oils on 8 November 2013, and the final one in June 2015. The WHO released REPLACE on 14 May 2018, and FDA compliance dates ran from 18 June 2018 to 1 January 2021.

The EU limit of 2 g per 100 g of fat was adopted on 24 April 2019. Food that did not comply was allowed on the market until 1 April 2021. In July 2023 the WHO issued its guideline on saturated and trans fatty acids.

Sources

  1. World Health Organization. WHO plan to eliminate industrially-produced trans-fatty acids from global food supply. News release, 14 May 2018.
  2. Mensink RP, Katan MB. Effect of dietary trans fatty acids on high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in healthy subjects. N Engl J Med. 1990.
  3. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, et al. Intake of trans fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease among women. Lancet. 1993.
  4. Ascherio A, Willett WC. Health effects of trans fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997.
  5. Leth T, Jensen HG, Mikkelsen AA, Bysted A. The effect of the regulation on trans fatty acid content in Danish food. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006.
  6. Restrepo BJ, Rieger M. Denmark’s policy on artificial trans fat and cardiovascular disease. Am J Prev Med. 2016.
  7. Angell SY, Silver LD, Goldstein GP, et al. Cholesterol control beyond the clinic: New York City’s trans fat restriction. Ann Intern Med. 2009.
  8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils. Federal Register 80 FR 34650. 17 June 2015.
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Final determination regarding partially hydrogenated oils (removing trans fat). Web page, content current as of 1 October 2024.
  10. Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/649 of 24 April 2019 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 as regards trans fat, other than trans fat naturally occurring in fat of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union, L 110, 25 April 2019, p. 17.
  11. World Health Organization. Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline. Geneva. 2023. See also the WHO news release of 17 July 2023.
  12. Assaf RR. Overview of local, state, and national government legislation restricting trans fats. Clin Ther. 2014.

Frequently asked questions about trans fat

Is trans fat banned?

Not everywhere, and the rules differ. In the US, the FDA ruled in 2015 that partially hydrogenated oils are not generally recognized as safe for any use in human food. Final compliance dates ran to January 1, 2021.

The EU limit is 2 g of industrial trans fat per 100 g of fat. Non-compliant food was allowed on the market until 1 April 2021. Denmark has had a 2 g limit since 2004. These rules do not cover the natural trans fat in dairy and meat.

The WHO says almost half of the world’s population is covered by best-practice policies, which leaves more than half without.

Is any amount of trans fat safe?

No amount is known to be safe or needed. The WHO recommends reducing intake to 1% of energy and suggests going lower. It puts 1% at less than 2.2 g a day on 2,000 calories.

EFSA and the US National Academies say as low as possible. In 2015 the FDA said it had not identified a threshold below which partially hydrogenated oils are safe.

Why can a label say 0 g trans fat when the food contains some?

In the US, trans fat is rounded to the nearest 0.5 g per serving. A serving with less than 0.5 g is declared as zero. Servings add up, so check the ingredient list for partially hydrogenated oil. The FDA said in 2015 that natural trans fat is only likely to reach 0.5 g per serving in products that contain these oils.

What foods contain trans fat?

The WHO lists margarine, vegetable shortening, vanaspati ghee, fried foods and baked goods such as crackers, biscuits and pies. It says baked and fried street and restaurant foods often contain industrial trans fat. Small natural amounts are in beef, milk and other ruminant foods. In our USDA data, ground beef has 1.33 g in 4 oz and semi-skimmed cow’s milk 0.21 g in a cup.

Is the natural trans fat in dairy and meat as bad as industrial trans fat?

At the same high dose, probably similar for blood fats. The quantitative review found the LDL to HDL ratio rose by 0.038 per 1% of energy for ruminant trans fat. For industrial trans fat it rose by 0.055, a difference that was not significant.

At usual intakes, which are far lower, the cohorts show no clear link with heart disease. Ruminant trans fat gave 0.93 times the risk, against 1.42 for industrial. The WHO’s 1% limit counts both kinds.

Does trans fat lower HDL cholesterol?

Yes, in trials. In 34 women and 25 men, 10% of energy as trans fat lowered HDL by 0.17 mmol/L against oleic acid. It raised LDL by 0.37 mmol/L.

Saturated fat raised LDL but left HDL unchanged. In another trial, HDL was 21% lower on a trans diet than on a saturated diet.

Is CLA a trans fat?

It has trans double bonds, so the WHO counts it in its definition of trans fat. The FDA’s label rule counts only trans bonds that are isolated, not conjugated, and its 2015 order does not apply to CLA. In a quantitative review, CLA raised the LDL to HDL ratio by 0.043 per 1% of energy. In one trial, the trans-10,cis-12 isomer raised the ratio while cis-9,trans-11 lowered it.

Is margarine full of trans fat?

It used to be, depending on the type. In a 1999 trial, stick margarine held 20.1 g of trans fat per 100 g of fat. Soft margarine held 7.4 g and semiliquid margarine under 0.5 g.

The US ruling on partially hydrogenated oils and the EU limit of 2 g per 100 g of fat now apply to margarine sold there. So check the ingredient list for partially hydrogenated oil, especially where no rule applies.